Are 10 spatial dimensions necessary for M-Theory?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the necessity of 10 spatial dimensions in M-theory and whether these extra dimensions must be spatial in nature. Participants explore the implications of higher dimensions in string theory and their mathematical characteristics, as well as related questions about quantum entanglement and Bell's theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the extra dimensions in M-theory and other string theories must be spatial, suggesting that this may be a matter of mathematical nature or convenience for explanation.
  • Another participant raises questions about string theory's explanation of quantum entanglement and the implications of Bell's inequality on the nature of reality.
  • Some participants propose that string theory likely does not explain quantum entanglement, while others argue that the relationship is not necessarily straightforward.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding Bell's theorem may require further exploration and that resources are available for those interested in delving deeper into the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the nature of extra dimensions and their necessity in M-theory, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion on quantum entanglement and Bell's theorem also shows a lack of consensus on the implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined the nature of the extra dimensions or the assumptions underlying their questions. The discussion on quantum entanglement and Bell's theorem remains unresolved, with references to external resources for further clarification.

dpa
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone,

I have not understood or even studied string theory.

However I was wondering whether the extra dimensions demanded by M-theory (10 spatial dimensions in that case), other string theories or even any other field theories necessarily demand the dimensions higher than four dimensions all are spatial.

Is it the nature (mathematical) of those dimensions that demand such dimensions to be spatial?
Or are remaining dimensions called spatial because we feel that would be easier to deal with/to explain and are more intuitive?

Thank YOu
Sincerely
DPA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and yes, another question,
does string theory explain quantum entanglement.
Lots of questions, but last one,
does test of bell's inequality necessarily require reality to be non local.
 
dpa said:
does string theory explain quantum entanglement.
Probably not, but see
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0605250

dpa said:
does test of bell's inequality necessarily require reality to be non local.
Not necessarily:
https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3622
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dpa said:
does test of bell's inequality necessarily require reality to be non local.
If you want to understand Bell's theorem, so that you can make up your own mind about this, you can read the excellent explanation http://quantumtantra.com/bell2.html. And if you have more questions about entanglement and Bell's theorem, you should ask them in the Quantum Mechanics forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K