Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Are 10 spatial dimensions necessary for M-Theory?

  1. Feb 29, 2012 #1

    dpa

    User Avatar

    Hi Everyone,

    I have not understood or even studied string theory.

    However I was wondering whether the extra dimensions demanded by M-theory (10 spatial dimensions in that case), other string theories or even any other field theories necessarily demand the dimensions higher than four dimensions all are spatial.

    Is it the nature (mathematical) of those dimensions that demand such dimensions to be spatial?
    Or are remaining dimensions called spatial because we feel that would be easier to deal with/to explain and are more intuitive?

    Thank YOu
    Sincerely
    DPA
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 29, 2012 #2

    dpa

    User Avatar

    and yes, another question,
    does string theory explain quantum entanglement.
    Lots of questions, but last one,
    does test of bell's inequality necessarily require reality to be non local.
     
  4. Mar 1, 2012 #3

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Probably not, but see
    http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0605250

    Not necessarily:
    https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3622 [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  5. Mar 2, 2012 #4
    If you want to understand Bell's theorem, so that you can make up your own mind about this, you can read the excellent explanation here. And if you have more questions about entanglement and Bell's theorem, you should ask them in the Quantum Mechanics forum.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Are 10 spatial dimensions necessary for M-Theory?
Loading...