Are all 2x2 Matrices with det(A) = 0 a Subspace of M2x2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OFFLINEX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

All 2x2 matrices with a determinant of zero do not form a subspace of M2x2. This conclusion is reached by examining the closure properties of addition and scalar multiplication. Specifically, when two matrices with det(A) = 0 are added, the resulting matrix can have a non-zero determinant, as demonstrated with examples such as [[3,13][3,13]] + [[5,5][7,7]] resulting in a matrix with a determinant of -20. Therefore, the set of all 2x2 matrices with det(A) = 0 fails to satisfy the requirements for being a subspace.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2x2 matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of determinants and their significance in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and subspace criteria
  • Basic operations of matrix addition and scalar multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in detail, focusing on 2x2 matrices
  • Learn about vector spaces and the criteria for subspaces in linear algebra
  • Explore examples of matrices that demonstrate closure properties
  • Investigate the implications of linear combinations of matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of matrices and vector spaces.

OFFLINEX
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine whether all 2x2 matrices with det(A) = 0 are a subspace of M2x2, the set of all 2x2 matrices with the standard operations of addition and scalar multiplication.

Homework Equations


Must pass in order to be a subspace
Closure property of addition - If w and v are objects in A, then w+v are contained within A
Closure property of scalar multiplication - If K is any real number scalar and v is any object in A, then kv is also in A

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't sure where to really start with this one so I picked a matrix with a determinant of 0
B2x2 = [[w1,w2][w1,w2] and added it to another det=0 matrix C2x2 = [[v1,v1][v2,v2]]

Added together they make D2x2 = [[w1+v1,w2+v1][w1+v2,w2+v2]] which wouldn't have a det of 0 so this wouldn't be a subspace right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea, but to make this a proof you need to either (1) give specific values for v_1, v_2, w_1, w_2 which show that the result matrix is invertible, or (2) compute the determinant of your result matrix in terms of v_1, v_2, w_1, w_2 and prove that this expression takes nonzero values.
 
Ok then an example that would disprove this as a subspace would be

[[3,13][3,13]]+[[5,5][7,7]] = [[8,18][10,20]]

det of [[8,18][10,20]] = -20 so it fails
 
Yes, this is correct.

There is also a simpler example (which doesn't match the pattern you gave): \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 \end{array} \right) + \left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array} \right).
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K