Are All Units in Z[sqrt(2)] of the Form +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2))^n?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Phillips101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Every unit in the ring Z[√2] can be expressed in the form ±(1 ± √2)^n, as established through the application of the multiplicative function ν(a + b√2) = a² - 2b². This function indicates that an element is a unit if ν(z) = ±1. The smallest element greater than 1 with this property is 1 + √2, which serves as a basis for generating all units through integer powers. The proof demonstrates that any unit can be represented as a power of this fundamental unit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic integers in quadratic fields
  • Familiarity with the Dirichlet's Unit Theorem
  • Knowledge of multiplicative functions in number theory
  • Basic manipulation of expressions involving square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Dirichlet's Unit Theorem in detail
  • Explore the properties of algebraic integers in Z[√d] for various d
  • Learn about the structure of units in quadratic fields
  • Investigate the implications of the multiplicative function ν in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying algebraic number theory who are interested in the properties of units in quadratic fields.

Phillips101
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
How would I show that every unit in Z[sqrt(2)] is of the form +/- (1 +/- sqrt(2) )^n ?

I can show these are all units, but I can't show every unit is one of these. From some research, I'm aware this is a special case of Dirichlet's Unit Theorem, but that is far above the level I'm working at.

Any help would be appreciated :)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every element of [tex]Z[\sqrt{2}][/tex] is of the form [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex], a,b integers.

Suppose [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex] is a unit. Then: [tex](a+b\sqrt{2})(c+d\sqrt{2})=1[/tex].

So:[tex]ac+(bc+ad)\sqrt{2}+2bd=1[/tex]. So already you know that [tex]bc=-ad[/tex].

Now just try manipulating the expression you are left with: [tex](ac+2bd=1)[/tex] using this fact. You should be able to show that [tex]a,b,c,d[/tex] must all be either 1 or -1.
 
The problem is they don't have to. For example, [tex]3+2\sqrt{2[/tex] is unit in [tex]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2} ][/tex]. I'm also trying to solve this problem right now.

Edit: I think I got it. Let [tex]\nu(a+b\sqrt{2})=a^2-2b^2[/tex]. It's multiplicative, so [tex]z[/tex] is unit iff [tex]\nu(z)=\pm 1[/tex]. It's easy to see that signs of [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]b[/tex] doesn't matter when it comes to invertibility, so we can assume [tex]z>0[/tex].

Lemma Smallest element of [tex]\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{2}][/tex] with [tex]z>1[/tex] and [tex]\nu(z)=\pm 1[/tex] is [tex]1+\sqrt{2}[/tex]
Proof
Let [tex]a,b\in \mathbb{N}[/tex]. If such element is of type [tex]a-b\sqrt{2}>1[/tex], then [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}>1[/tex] and so [tex]\nu({a-b\sqrt{2}})>1[/tex]. Similarly if it's [tex]-a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex]. It has to be [tex]a+b\sqrt{2}[/tex]. Case with one of a, b equal zero is easily checked by hand. This proves the lemma.

Now suppose [tex]\nu(z)=1[/tex], [tex]z > 0[/tex]. Let [tex]z_0 = 1+\sqrt{2}[/tex]. There exists integer k (positive or negative) with [tex]z_0^k \leq z < z_0^{k+1}[/tex]. Easily to check, [tex]1\leq z z_0^{-k} < z_0[/tex]. If [tex]z z_0^{-k}\neq 1[/tex], it contradicts minimality of [tex]z_0[/tex], and so [tex]z=z_0^k[/tex].

Hope I haven't messed up too badly.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K