Are Animals Guilty Until Proven Innocent in the Debate on Sentience?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dissident Dan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of animal sentience, exploring definitions, implications, and the burden of proof in debates about whether animals possess consciousness and subjective experiences. Participants examine the philosophical and scientific dimensions of sentience, including varying levels of awareness and emotional capacity among different species.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the prevailing assumption is that animals are not sentient, which they liken to a "guilty until proven innocent" mindset.
  • Definitions of sentience are debated, with some suggesting it implies a high level of awareness and self-awareness, while others argue it simply refers to the capacity to feel and perceive.
  • Examples of self-awareness in higher mammals, such as dolphins and primates, are cited as evidence of sentience by some participants.
  • Others propose that sentience exists on a spectrum, with varying degrees of consciousness and emotional capacity across different species and individuals.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of defining awareness and consciousness, with some participants suggesting that these concepts are inherently complex and not fully understood.
  • There is a distinction made between programmed responses and genuine emotional experiences, questioning whether animals can truly understand their feelings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of sentience, with no consensus reached on the nature of animal consciousness or the burden of proof in the debate. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in definitions of sentience and awareness are acknowledged, as well as the complexity of subjective experience, which remains a point of contention among participants.

  • #31
Originally posted by russ_watters
Assuming that animals are conscious and sentient without evidence one way or another is presumptive - that's pretty much the definition of the word.

Well, I do have evidence. The evidence is really overwhelming for anyone who cares to analyze it objectively.

The "guilty until proven innocent" is just not giving people enough credit for having thought through their opinions.

I'm not sure of what, exactly, who mean here or how it relates to the discussion.

In a court of law, a person is assumed innocent until proven guilty partially for the purpose of strength of proof but also partially to set a default position until the evidence can be heard. You and I have evidence on which to base our opinions, so I don't see any need to assume it, we just have to choose our standard of proof.

Do you think that anyone has had strong enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that other species are not capable of consciousness and feeling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Do you think that anyone has had strong enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that other species are not capable of consciousness and feeling?

Feeling yes, consciousness, not obviously so. Animals can feel and remember and have aims, but that doesn't add up to consciousness.

I think yoiu have to have at least the capability for language to be conscious. You may not have language itself (Helen Keller before Miss Sullivan broke through to her) but the capability is linked to things going on in your head that are a necessary part of consciousness (evidence, introspection. Look for yourself).
 
  • #33
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Feeling yes, consciousness, not obviously so. Animals can feel and remember and have aims, but that doesn't add up to consciousness.

I think yoiu have to have at least the capability for language to be conscious. You may not have language itself (Helen Keller before Miss Sullivan broke through to her) but the capability is linked to things going on in your head that are a necessary part of consciousness (evidence, introspection. Look for yourself).

Oops. You accidentally misread my question.

The question is: "Do you think that anyone has had strong enough evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that other species are not capable of consciousness and feeling?"

The question is the opposite of what you thought I was asking.
--------------
You and I have very different definitions of consciousness. Yours just seems to be "having a certain level of intelligence". I define consciousness as the ability to have subjective experiences and be cognizant of things. Linguistic abilities is not a precondition for this.

My definition seems to be more in line with the webster.com definition:
Main Entry: con·scious·ness
Pronunciation: -n&s
Function: noun
Date: 1632
1 a : the quality or state of being aware especially of something within oneself b : the state or fact of being conscious of an external object, state, or fact c : AWARENESS; especially : concern for some social or political cause
2 : the state of being characterized by sensation, emotion, volition, and thought : MIND
3 : the totality of conscious states of an individual
4 : the normal state of conscious life <regained consciousness>
5 : the upper level of mental life of which the person is aware as contrasted with unconscious processes
 
  • #34
What, in detail, do you mean by "subjective experiences". That is really the nub. An animal has inner experiences, but are they subjective? That suggests to me a clear sense of self, which I more or less identify with (human) consciousness.
 
  • #35
Actually, "Subjective experiences" is really redundant, because all experiences are subjective. A computer does not have experiences, but a person does. You have sensory perception. You feel happy or sad, excited or drowsy, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K