Are Assumptions in Spivak's Calculus a Common Theme Throughout the Book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thinker301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spivak
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the reader's concerns about Spivak's "Calculus," specifically regarding the book's assumptions, such as basic algebraic principles and definitions of even or odd numbers. Participants clarify that while Spivak does make assumptions, these are generally accepted axioms in mathematics, and such assumptions become less frequent after the initial chapters. The conversation delves into the nature of axioms and functions, emphasizing that addition is treated as a function, which is crucial for understanding equality in mathematical proofs. The dialogue also touches on the philosophical implications of axioms and equality, highlighting differing perspectives on how these concepts should be approached in mathematical logic. Overall, the consensus is that while Spivak assumes certain foundational concepts, readers can expect a more rigorous treatment as they progress through the book.
  • #31
Final thought: mathematics is the science of quantity. Whatever flows from that is acceptable (if it's good for science).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Even that which is not good for science is acceptable. ;)
 
  • #33
OK, I think this thread is done now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
10K