Are Car Audio Amplifier Fuse Ratings Misleading?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thankz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuse Power Rms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the perceived discrepancies between the advertised power ratings of car audio amplifiers and their fuse ratings. Participants explore the implications of these ratings for system performance, including concerns about distortion, power supply requirements, and wiring considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the advertised power ratings, suggesting they may only represent peak power at high distortion levels.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the adequacy of the car's alternator to support the amplifiers, indicating that a higher capacity alternator may be necessary.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of using appropriately sized wiring to prevent overheating and potential fire hazards when drawing high currents.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the need for high-powered systems if they do not intend to utilize the full capabilities of the amplifiers.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for battery drain if the audio system is used without the engine running, emphasizing the need for proper planning in high-power setups.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reliability of the power ratings or the necessity of high-powered systems. Multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of the fuse ratings and the overall design of the audio system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering the entire electrical system, including the alternator and battery capabilities, when designing high-power audio setups. There are unresolved questions about the specific power output and distortion levels of the amplifiers.

thankz
Messages
265
Reaction score
40
I just bought a few car audio amplifiers, they are advertised as 6000 watts and 800 watts respectively but the fuse ratings are 60ampsx2 and 20ampsx2 so am I missing something here? I purposely bought higher wattage amps because I believe their only advertising peak power (assuming they use slo-blo fuses).

am I correct in buying high wattage advertised amps assuming I can get 1440 and 480 true rms watts out of them?

I plan on getting a low distortion high spl 18" sub in a first order bandpass box and 4 6-1/2" coax speakers and building a active crossover hooked up to a deck with a usb interface for an ipod.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What you are saying is reasonable I beleive.

Maybe the bigger amp can produce 6000 peak watts...but it is likely to make that at 99% distortion.

Perhaps it makes its 1440 watts at .1% distortion...don't know, have to read specs if available.

But this brings up another concern. Is your alternator powerful enough to produce a steady 160 amps and still run your car accessories? If not, will likely need bigger alternator.
 
I won't be running it at full blast, and it won't be on all the time so it should be ok.

btw they say .1% distortion but not at what levels.
 
Physics says energy is conserved.
You can't get more out than you put in.

Power is rate of doing work or using energy.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/work.html
For a brief instant you can take energy out of something faster than you're putting it in
but then you have to reduce output and let it restore the balance.

Less than highly principled marketeers use the term "peak instantaneous power" to roughly quadruple the claimed power output of their products. Power numbers sell .

You're right to question claimed power versus fuse on input.
 
thanks jim, I knew the power claims were funny, I just wanted to be sure.
 
If you are actually running 120 amps to an amp, make sure you use at least a #2 wire...or else your wire will be the fuse itself...also known as an electrical car fire.

Just keep the rated output of your alternator in the back of your head...it may work, it may not. I'm pretty sure your average car alternator these days puts out 100 to 120 amps in general...it will use all it's power to run if many car accesseries are on. If your alternator is not big enough, no biggy, buy a 300 amp high out alternator and you will be all set.

You know you will have a problem if the headlights dim or the windshield wipers slow down when the stereo is cranked. But as the smart guy I assume you are, you will work this out ahead of time. You were crunching numbers at the fuses of your amplifiers...crunch the numbers all the way to the source. The source will actually be your limiting factor.
 
Last edited:
buy a 300 amp high out alternator and you will be all set.

and upsize the wires between alternator and battery.

I could tell an anecdote about a Corvette that ate alternators... suffice it to say I put the seventh one on it and found the trouble. That made the owner very happy.

old jim
 
jim hardy said:
and upsize the wires between alternator and battery.

I could tell an anecdote about a Corvette that ate alternators... suffice it to say I put the seventh one on it and found the trouble. That made the owner very happy.

old jim

True that.

One more thing...if you run that stereo without the engine on, it will drain your battery in a big hurry...leaving you with no music and NO power to start your engine. Stranded with no tunes...not good. And that's with all the perfect wiring and 300 amp alternator.

Incidentally, at least a 350 MCM or 185mm^2 is the wire you will need from 300 amp alternator to battery.
That's a BIG wire! Lots to think about in building high power systems that weren't orgininally designed to be there!
It can be done, just needs to be well thought out.

Which brings up one more thought...is your battery capable of being charged with a max of 300 amps? Prob should consider increasing the ground size from the battery to the chassis as well!
 
Last edited:
thankz said:
I won't be running it at full blast, and it won't be on all the time so it should be ok.

This statement is like saying you are building a 350 small block engine to make 600 HP at 8,000 RPM.

But to save money you are going to use cast iron pistons and rods with a cast iron crank instead of using all forged parts. To justify this, you say that you will only rev the engine to 5500 RPM and only produce 400 HP.

In other words, why would you build a high powered system unless you are going to use all its power with confidence?

Do the job 100% correct to start. No regrets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
20K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
84K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
27K