Help with a simple amplifier design for an audio signal.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a simple audio amplifier, focusing on gain calculations, input/output voltage specifications, and considerations for biasing and noise management. Participants explore various aspects of amplifier design, including signal types (RMS vs. peak-to-peak), power supply constraints, and coupling methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on whether to convert the output audio voltage to RMS or the input signal to peak voltage for gain calculations.
  • Another participant proposes converting the input RMS voltage to peak-to-peak voltage, suggesting a gain of 2.1V is reasonable.
  • Concerns are raised about ensuring consistent units (RMS vs. peak) when calculating gain, with a suggestion to reconsider the implications for power supply voltage and output headroom.
  • Discussion includes the importance of the audio signal's bias, with a participant noting potential clipping issues if the gain is too high.
  • A question arises regarding the use of a capacitor between amplifier inputs for noise management, with some participants expressing skepticism about this approach.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of using AC coupling to avoid bias issues, while also highlighting the need for level shifting if DC coupling is required.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for calculating gain and managing signal bias. There is no consensus on the best approach to coupling the inputs or the necessity of the capacitor placement, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of matching input and output voltage specifications and the implications of power supply limitations on amplifier design. There are unresolved questions regarding the specific configurations and thresholds for the amplifier components.

TheAnalogKid83
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm designing an amplifier and need help with some basic ideas (Filtering is already taken care of). My main question is bolded.

The output is an audio signal, and it drives an 8 ohm speaker. The power is 1 watt through this speaker.

The input signal is coming from another amplifier that says its full-scale output is 1Vrms.

So the output specification is 1 watt through 8 ohm speaker, so (Vo^2)/R = 1W, Vo = sqrt(8) = +or- 2.828427V. The power rail of the amp will be 5V and it can source over 2 watts, so this will be ok.





So now I know my gain is to be Vo/Vi = 2.828427V/1Vrms. . .
Do I need to convert my output audio voltage to RMS, or do I need to convert my 1Vrms input to normal V? Also, I would imagine my Vi of 1Vrms is going to actually be greater since the input impedance of my audio amplifer is going to be more than a 10k ohm load as specced for the input signal.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've decided to convert RMS to peak to peak voltage and get 1V * sqrt(2) = 1.41421 Vpp

which is funny that it works out to an exact gain of 2V/V. I'm going to give a little extra gain to 2.1V.

Is this reasonable?
 
One thing. You computed the 2.82v as RMS (or DC).
You might want to reconsider what this means when converted to a peak to peak sine wave in terms of your power supply voltage and output amp headroom requirements (unless its a rail to rail amp in which case headroom does not apply).

Also your gain will be wrong unless input and output are specified the same. You don't want mixed RMS and Peak.
 
NoTime said:
One thing. You computed the 2.82v as RMS (or DC).
You might want to reconsider what this means when converted to a peak to peak sine wave in terms of your power supply voltage and output amp headroom requirements (unless its a rail to rail amp in which case headroom does not apply).

Also your gain will be wrong unless input and output are specified the same. You don't want mixed RMS and Peak.

Okei well my dilemma has been that the gain units did not match up (V and Vrms) so I did then just change my Vrms to Vpp instead, which should be my magnitude of highest signal, which will be best to use as the DC gain. Is this right to you?

Also, the power supply is 5V to 0V, and I should never go over 5V according to my power calculation giving me a voltage max below 3V. I look through the datasheet, but see nothing about thresholds or clipping, so I am optimistically assuming it is rail to rail.

What you mentioned has just put another thing of consideration into my mind though, is what the audio signal is biased at going into the amp. . it better not be biased at 0V or else I'm in trouble.

The power supply to the chip that is sourcing the audio signal into my amp is GND to 3.3V. So at best, its bias should be 1.65V so that there can be equal negative and positive swing in the signal. If this is the case, I have to worry about clipping at the negative end if my gain is too high.
 
This question is important. On the inputs of the amplifier, I was told to put a cap between the inputs, to "keep the noise potential the same" between them. I always thought to put noise through the cap between the signal and ground, not between the two signals. I looked through my electronics book and cannot find a single example where a cap is AC coupling the two inputs to the amp.. does anyone know about this?
 
TheAnalogKid83 said:
Okei well my dilemma has been that the gain units did not match up (V and Vrms) so I did then just change my Vrms to Vpp instead, which should be my magnitude of highest signal, which will be best to use as the DC gain. Is this right to you?
RMS and DC are equivalent representations.
That is the definition of RMS.
You had it right in the first post :smile:

TheAnalogKid83 said:
Also, the power supply is 5V to 0V, and I should never go over 5V according to my power calculation giving me a voltage max below 3V. I look through the datasheet, but see nothing about thresholds or clipping, so I am optimistically assuming it is rail to rail.
This is related to the confusion you are having in the prior question.
Perhaps it would help you to graph a 5v Peak to Peak sine wave,
the max for your 5v power supply, then compute the RMS voltage from the graph.
Tell us what you get for the RMS voltage.

TheAnalogKid83 said:
What you mentioned has just put another thing of consideration into my mind though, is what the audio signal is biased at going into the amp. . it better not be biased at 0V or else I'm in trouble.
You did say you had the datasheet for your power amp.
Most of these are just a variation on the op-amp.
The manufacturer usually includes a generalized circuit for their chip, which can be quite useful as a starting point for a design.

TheAnalogKid83 said:
The power supply to the chip that is sourcing the audio signal into my amp is GND to 3.3V. So at best, its bias should be 1.65V so that there can be equal negative and positive swing in the signal. If this is the case, I have to worry about clipping at the negative end if my gain is too high.
You could use AC coupling in which case this is not a problem.
If you really need DC coupling then you will need to do some level shifting.
 
TheAnalogKid83 said:
This question is important. On the inputs of the amplifier, I was told to put a cap between the inputs, to "keep the noise potential the same" between them. I always thought to put noise through the cap between the signal and ground, not between the two signals. I looked through my electronics book and cannot find a single example where a cap is AC coupling the two inputs to the amp.. does anyone know about this?
Perhaps with a resistor as a low pass filter to reduce the high frequency response.
One of amp inputs would be at a ground equivilant.
It seems unlikely that you would want to do this.
Where did you get the "keep the noise potential the same".
That just sounds wrong.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K