Are Dimensions Truly Relative to the Observer in the Coastline Paradox?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Flying_Dutchman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimensions Relative
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of dimensions and whether they are relative to the observer, particularly in the context of the coastline paradox. Participants explore the implications of viewing geometric objects at different scales and distances, touching on theoretical and conceptual aspects of dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that dimensions might be perceived differently based on the observer's perspective, suggesting that a point can appear as a plane when viewed at a high magnification.
  • Others argue that a point remains a point regardless of how it is observed, asserting that its dimensionality does not change with distance.
  • A participant emphasizes that the observed size is dependent on distance, but the actual dimensionality of objects remains constant.
  • One participant questions how we can be certain of the definitions of dimensions, indicating that definitions play a crucial role in understanding dimensionality.
  • Another participant notes that mathematical objects like points, planes, and spheres are used in physics to create models, which can vary based on the context of the study.
  • A reference to the coastline paradox and fractal dimensions is provided as a related topic for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the relativity of dimensions, with some asserting that dimensions are fixed while others suggest they may vary based on observation. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants rely on definitions and perspectives that may not be universally accepted, and the discussion includes assumptions about the nature of observation and measurement that are not fully explored.

Flying_Dutchman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
No. The OBSERVED or APPARENT size will depend on distance but the actual will not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest, Chestermiller and Ibix
Flying_Dutchman said:
If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane
No - a point is always a point. If it looks different at any distance then it's an extended object. Similarly an extended object is an extended object always, even if you can't resolve it.

"I personally cannot see it therefore it does not exist" is not the way to do science.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest, Vanadium 50, russ_watters and 2 others
Ibix said:
No - a point is always a point.
Follow-up question: How do we know?
Answer: Because we define it that way.
 
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?

If you want to study something interesting about dimensions try this:

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: diogenesNY, QuantumQuest, Asymptotic and 1 other person
Flying_Dutchman said:
A point is taken as an example of a 1D, a plane 2D and a sphere is 3D. If a point is viewed say at 1000x enlarged the point appears as a plane similarly if we a view a large sphere from very far it does appear as a dot. So can we say that dimension are relative to the observer ? Had our sights been different would dimension be different ?
The point, the plane, and the sphere are all mathematical objects. In physics we create models that make use of these objects. For example, we can model Earth as a point and get a really good understanding of how it behaves relative to other members of our solar system. However, for other purposes we may model a patch of Earth's surface as a plane, like when we are building a house. For other purposes, we model it as a sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K