Are electron energy transitions instantaneous

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Naty1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Energy transitions in atoms, such as when an electron emits a photon, are considered instantaneous due to the point-like nature of the electron and the interaction occurring at a single point. However, in the case of molecules and atomic nuclei, these transitions are not instantaneous; they involve a readjustment that requires a finite amount of time. The discussion highlights the importance of treating contributing amplitudes as instantaneous while acknowledging that the overall process does not have a definite time associated with it. This distinction is crucial for understanding quantum mechanics and the behavior of wave packets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of wave packets
  • Feynman path integral formulation
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of wave packet behavior in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the Feynman path integral approach in detail
  • Study the differences between atomic and molecular transitions
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic interactions in extended objects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in atomic and molecular transitions and their implications in quantum theory.

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
I've been wondering if it is thought energy transitions in an atom are instantaneous or not...as when a photon is absorbed or emitted.

Whatever the answer, is the same case with transitions in molecules?

Seems like creation and annihilation operators might describe what happens, but a quick scan of Wiki did not provide an obvious answer.

It seems the center of a wave packet DOES suffer a delay when reflected from a potential discontinuity while there is no apparent delay with a classical particle. Is this a clue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is an important difference between treating the entire process as instantaneous (which would not work), versus treating the various contributing amplitudes as instantaneous (which I believe is how the theory does it). Just as in the two-slit problem, we must add the amplitudes over all the possible paths (as in the Feynman path integral approach), and each one has a definite propagation time associated with it, but this does not mean that the whole process of a particle going through two slits has a definite time associated with it. Indeed, this would seem to connect with the uncertainty in the arrival time of the particle, which also relates to the "wave packet" issue you raise. A wave packet already reflects a sum over possible histories, in a sense. If we cannot tell how long something takes to happen without precisely measuring the time, and possibly changing the happening, then how can we say it is instantaneous?
 
Yes, an atomic transition in which an electron emits a photon is instantaneous. The electron is pointlike, and the electron-photon interaction takes place at a single point. A photon cannot be emitted gradually! However as Ken_G says, the interaction can occur at different places and different times, and the amplitudes for each possibility must be summed over.

The situation is not the same for a molecule, or even am atomic nucleus. Since these are extended objects, an electromagnetic transition will not be instantaneous. It will involve a readjustment, which takes a finite amount of time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K