Loren Booda said:
Do reputable fraternities have any responsibility to reform decadent ones?
There are no distinct responsibilities, but chapters of different fraternities will often cooperate on one campus -- to organize some large philanthropic event, for example -- and that does lead to some transfer of ideas.
On the other hand, distinct chapters of the same fraternity -- at two different schools -- often do quite a lot of "reform" work for chapters they feel are slipping. Most fraternities have annual or semi-annual regional and national conferences, and the point of all of these conferences is to educate and inform the leadership of each chapter on how best to accomplish goals and improve their chapters. You'd probably be
very surprised how professional such conferences are -- I was. The national headquarters of all fraternities are staffed, of course, with professionals, and these professionals are tasked with improving the fraternity from the top down.
Do most universities enforce an honor code upon such social societies, or do these groups wield undue influence over the universities themselves?
Rach3 is honestly talking out his ass on this topic, probably because he has no actual experience.
Fraternities have absolutely no power over their universities. Universities can and do revoke charters for almost any reason. If a party is busted for underage drinking, the chapter is
gone. If the university is not willing to offer a chapter housing, and the surrounding town will not budge on zoning laws, the chapter is
gone. If a chapter does not meet academic requirements, or is caught enabling cheating, the chapter is
gone. Universities couldn't care less about revoking charters, and fraternities are powerless to stop such action, legally, financially, or otherwise. Fraternities regularly have to expel brothers who they believe are a threat to the fraternity's future.
What have most frat brothers or sisters in common besides the stereotypes of nepotism and drinking?
They're obviously social people, who seek a sense of belonging and want to be involved in "big things" around campus. We hosted concerts, put on very popular philanthropies at a local motorsports track, held very elaborate socials, and generally had a fantastic time. We also held mandatory study hours for brothers who weren't doing well enough (a GPA of under 3.0 meant the brother had to attend supervised study hours, with tutors provided, for ten hours a week; under 2.5 meant expulsion), had mandatory volunteer weekends, and did many things that didn't fall under Rach3's stereotype of idle drug abuse and cheating.
In fact, I will admit that my brothers drank their fair share of beer. When they weren't drinking beer, my brothers were also the presidents of honor socities, tae kwon do champions, 4.0 students, varsity football players, people who had worked on Habitat for Humanity houses literally every weekend for years, successful entrepreneurs, leaders of search and rescue organizations, operators of the student astronomical observatory, published writers, brilliant mathematicians, musical performers with record contracts, and pretty much some of the most upstanding, incredible young men I've ever had the honor of standing with on a stage. These were men I would never have met in any other way, and
that is what made my fraternity special for me.
I remember so many wonderful things about those years of my life: the elegant socials, playing guitar on-stage while my brother Lee sang, tutoring other guys in their study hours, filling up a whole block of stadium seats at the football games, having killer tailgate parties with alumni, singing songs while we cleaned up highways, lifting what felt like 500 kids in and out of go-karts as part of our speed week philantrophy event... god, you name it.
I have so many fond memories of my fraternity, in fact, that it makes me sad that anyone else would
categorically recommend against such organizations.
- Warren