Are Hilbert spaces uniquely defined for a given system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hilbert spaces are uniquely defined for a given physical system, as established in the discussion. The distinction between the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures highlights that while the time-dependent state and time-independent observables can describe the same system, they do not reside in the same Hilbert space. The Hilbert space for one-particle states consists of equivalence classes of square integrable functions from ℝ³ to ℂ, confirming that the time-dependent wavefunction is merely a curve within this space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically the Schrödinger and Heisenberg formulations.
  • Familiarity with Hilbert space concepts in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of square integrable functions and their properties.
  • Basic grasp of time-dependent and time-independent states in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of isomorphisms in Hilbert spaces for physical systems.
  • Investigate the differences between time-dependent and time-independent formulations in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of wavefunctions in quantum state representation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on quantum state representations, and anyone interested in the mathematical structure of quantum theory.

diegzumillo
Messages
180
Reaction score
20
Hi there!

Repeating the question on the title: Are Hilbert spaces uniquely defined for a given system?

I started to think about this when I was reading about Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures/formulations. From my understanding, you can describe a system analyzing the time dependent state defined by [tex]\left\vert \psi \left( t\right) \right\rangle =U\left( t,t_{0}\right)\left\vert \psi \left( t_{0}\right) \right\rangle[/tex], while keeping the observables time-independent (which would be the Schrödinger picture). And this is totally equivalent to description of the system by a time-independent state, and observables defined by [tex]A^{\prime }\left( t\right) =U^{\dagger }\left( t,t_{0}\right) AU\left(t,t_{0}\right)[/tex]. (Heisenberg picture) However, I don't think it's the same Hilbert space! In the first one, the elements of the space are time dependent, while in the other they're not.

Am I making any sense? :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is "yes". The Hilbert space is what defines what physical system we're talking about, so it must be uniquely defined (up to isomorphisms of course) for each physical system.

The Hilbert space of one-particle states consists of (equivalence classes of) square integrable functions from [itex]\mathbb R^3[/itex] (not [itex]\mathbb R^4[/itex]) into [itex]\mathbb C[/itex]. Your [itex]|\psi(t)\rangle[/itex] is a member of that space, but the map [itex]t\mapsto|\psi(t)\rangle[/itex] (the "time dependent wavefunction") is a curve in that space.
 
Right. Thanks Fredrik!
That clear things up :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K