Are implicit and partial differentiations related?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Implicit Partial
Click For Summary
Implicit differentiation and partial differentiation can yield related results under certain conditions, particularly when exploring functions where one variable depends on another. In the discussed example, implicit differentiation produced dy/dx = -3y/2x, while a non-standard manipulation of partial derivatives led to a similar form, suggesting a negative relationship. This raises questions about whether such a connection is consistent across different functions or merely coincidental. The distinction between independent and dependent variables is crucial, as it affects the validity of the manipulations used. Further exploration with different functions, like f(x,y)=sin(x^2 + y^2), is encouraged to investigate the generality of this relationship.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,762
Reaction score
248
I was working two different but superficially related problems, and noticed that if I did something that is generally not allowed, the results were connected by a negative sign. My questions are whether this will always turn out this way, and if so, why.
The two problems were

(A) implicit differentiation: given f(x, y(x)) = f(x,y) =(x^3)(y^2) = c for a constant c, then dy/dx = -3y/2x
(B) partial differentiation: given f(x,y) =z=(x^3)(y^2) , then δf/δx = 3(x^2)(y^2) & δf/δy =2(x^3)y so doing something that is not allowed, (δf/δx)/(δf/δy) = δy/δx = 3y/2x.


Coincidence, or can this be generalized (that dy/dx = the negative of working with the partial derivatives in this way), and the sloppiness justified? [My own impression is that it shouldn't be, but perhaps there is some better link between implicit and partial differentiations that someone can point out.]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For partial differentiation the x and y are independent variables, but for the example you've shown y is dependent on x.

Why not try another function like f(x,y)=sin(x^2 + y^2) and see if it holds up?
 
right you are, jedishrfu. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K