Are Inertia and Momentum the Same in Physics?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter student85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Momentum
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 7K views
student85
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Are they the same thing?
momentum = p = mv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inertia is more like m
 
Interia has no numerical value unlike momentum. It's just a property of an object based on its mass.
 
Ok, that's what I thought. But then, how would you define momentum? (in words)
 
"momentum is the measure of inertia "
and inertia is the property of the system or the object to resist a change in its state i.e either the state of motion or of rest
 
"momentum is the measure of inertia "

Inertia is unchanging whereas momentum can be changing. (for all classical approx.)

momentum is concerned with moving things.
 
Virtual said momentum is the measure of inertia.
Then, velocity must be part of inertia. I think it makes sense since the faster the object is going, the harder it is to change its condition...am I right?
 
student85 said:
Virtual said momentum is the measure of inertia. [That] makes sense since the faster the object is going, the harder it is to change its condition...

I wouldn't equate inertia with momentum. It's just as hard to stop a fast object as it is, after stopping it, to then speed the object back up again, however the stationary object has infinitely less momentum.

Perhaps a formal definition for inertia (or moment of inertia) should be the force (or torque) with which an object resists a change in its velocity (or in its angular velocity). Consequently, the SI unit for inertia would be kg (or, er, kgm^2/rad).
 
student85 said:
Virtual said momentum is the measure of inertia.
Virtual was wrong to say that because...
Then, velocity must be part of inertia. I think it makes sense since the faster the object is going, the harder it is to change its condition...am I right?
No, you are clearly not right as f=ma doesn't say anything about velocity, does it? If it got harder to change velocity when speed was higher, those terms should appear in that equation.

(caveat: relativity not needed here)