Are local min/max of a cubic function determined by the zeros alone?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The local minima and maxima of a cubic function are determined by the roots of its first derivative, not solely by the zeros of the function itself. For the cubic function $$y=\left(x-4\right)\left(x+1\right)(x+2)$$, the first derivative $$y'=3{x}^{2}-2x-10$$ has roots at approximately -1.5226 and 2.1893, indicating the locations of local extrema. However, not every root of the first derivative corresponds to an extremum; for instance, the function $$y=x^3$$ has a root of even multiplicity, resulting in no sign change and thus no extremum at that point. Understanding the relationship between the zeros of the function and the behavior of its derivative is crucial for identifying local extrema.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cubic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of derivatives and how to compute them
  • Familiarity with concepts of local minima and maxima
  • Ability to analyze the sign of a function and its derivative
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the behavior of cubic functions and their derivatives
  • Learn about the implications of even and odd multiplicities of roots
  • Explore the application of the first derivative test for identifying extrema
  • Investigate the graphical representation of cubic functions and their critical points
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of cubic functions and their critical points through calculus.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Just curious are cubic functions dirvel from just having the zeros, does that always determine where the local min/max is. I notice many cubic graphs given on homework show where the zeros are but the local min/max is not given.

For example
$$y=\left(x-4\right)\left(x+1\right)(x+2)={x}^{3}-{x}^{2 }-10x-8$$
$$y'=3{x}^{2 }-2x-10$$

$y'=0$ is $ - 1.5226,2.1893$ and min=-24.1926 max=1.3778

So I presume the local min/max are fixed values given the zeros
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If a cubic function has relative extrema, then they will occur at places where the first derivative has roots. But, at the roots of the first derivative, you won't always find an extremum...consider $y=x^3$.
 
OK I thought the humps could be moved despite the zeros but doesn't look like it.
So the only to find the extreme is by the derivative
 
karush said:
OK I thought the humps could be moved despite the zeros but doesn't look like it.
So the only to find the extreme is by the derivative

Yes, the first derivative will tell you where the function itself is increasing/decreasing/turning. If the first derivative has differing signs on either side of a root, then you know that root corresponds with an extremum for the function. This will happen for all roots as long as they are all of odd multiplicity.

Observe that in the example I gave of $y=x^3$, the first derivative has a root of even multiplicity, and so its sign does not change as it crosses this first derivative root.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K