Are q and q' dependent variables in Lagrangian or not?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the independence of variables q and q' in the context of the Lagrangian function L = L(q, q'). The author argues that while q and q' are functions of time and can appear dependent when specific paths are considered, they are fundamentally independent variables in the abstract formulation of Lagrangian mechanics. The relationship between these variables becomes dependent only after applying the principle of least action, which leads to the Euler-Lagrange equations that govern the equations of motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the Lagrangian function
  • Familiarity with the principle of least action
  • Knowledge of Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Basic calculus, particularly in relation to functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Euler-Lagrange equations in classical mechanics
  • Explore the principle of least action and its implications in physics
  • Investigate the role of independent and dependent variables in variational calculus
  • Examine specific examples of Lagrangians in different physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of motion and energy in physical systems.

DOTDO
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
Hi.

I have thought that the variables q and q' in L = L(q, q') are independent. (q' = dq/dt)

Of course q and q' are functions of time t , but they are only dependent in terms of t .

However, in the sight of general(or abstract? I mean, not specific) functional L(q, q'),

q and q' are just independent variables of L .

Only after L is determined by using calculus of variations, they are dependent.

Here is more detailed logic of mine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1a) Think about the coordinates (x, y, z). All x, y and z are independent thus they can make the coordinates. And there are infinite possible functions z = f(x,y).

2a) Let's choose a specific function among those infinite possible functions, say, a line (x, y, z) = (s, s, s)
where s is a parameter. Then, by considering this function, x and y are no longer independent because
x=y on this line.

1b) There is a coordinates (q, q', L). There are infinite possible functions L = L(q, q').
And We don't know what path the particle will follow. When q=1, q' can be 1 or 100. When q=2, q' can be 1.1 or 500. This means that there are infinite possible paths, or physical laws.
On each path q and q' are dependent. But considering all the paths, eventually it means q and q' are independent variables.

2b) In 2a, we chose a specific function. Here, in Lagrangian, it is same to adding a condition, the principle of least action, which yields the Euler-Lagrange equation.
By this condition, a specific Lagrangian L is chosen, which makes q and q' dependent.
And this also means that among those infinite possible paths, we chose a specific path, which can be said that we chose a specific law, Newton's 2nd law, among those infinite possible physical laws.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this logic wrong or not?

Please point out where I am wrong. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Logic is just fine. Lagrangian has independent variables ##q## and ##\dot q## (and possibly others). Euler-Lagrange equations establish a relationship and you get the equations of motion.

Compare the mechanical energy of a mass on a spring: E is a sum of spring energy, gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. So the independent variables are ##y## and ##\dot y##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DOTDO

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K