Are the Force Equations for Rotational Motion Accurate?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the accuracy of force equations in the context of rotational motion, specifically involving two blocks with different masses. Participants explore the formulation of equations of motion and the potential energy of the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of force equations and the potential benefits of employing energy methods. Questions arise regarding the correct expression for potential energy and how to differentiate energy equations to find equations of motion.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between variables, with some participants suggesting the need to express potential energy in terms of specific variables. Guidance has been offered regarding the differentiation of energy equations and the implications of conservation laws.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the potential energy function and its dependence on the position of the masses, while others note the importance of approximations in the context of small oscillations.

Bling Fizikst
Messages
119
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
refer to image
Relevant Equations
refer to image
Screenshot 2024-03-24 212556.png


Writing force equations for block ##m## : $$T-mr\omega^2=m\ddot{r}$$ and for block ##M## : $$Mg-T=M\ddot{r}$$ I think there are mistakes in my equations as they are leading to nowhere and morever i think force methods are really risky in this regard . It would be better to write the total energy of the system which i don't know how to . I tried to write $$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
 
PeroK said:
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
No
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Bling Fizikst said:
No
It should come out from conservation of AM and energy. You're aiming for an equation for ##\ddot r##. Which you should be able to get from:

Bling Fizikst said:
$$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
 
PeroK said:
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
 
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)##
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
 
PeroK said:
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
 
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
What precisely is stopping you from writing down an expression for ##U(r)##?
 
  • #10
Bling Fizikst said:
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
How does the position of the mass M depend on ##r##? Take ##r = R## as the zero point.
 
  • #11
Is it -Mgr:nb)
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
Bling Fizikst said:
Is it -Mgr:nb)
What happens to ##M## as ##r## increases?
 
  • #13
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way . It gives me the wrong ans anyways , so it is wrong
 
  • #14
Bling Fizikst said:
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way
Yes. Note that ##Mg## is related to ##L## by the initial equilibrium.
 
  • #15
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
 
  • #16
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
 
  • #18
vela said:
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
No need to consider only small oscillations?
 
  • #19
Oh, you were asking about the steps preceding that last step. Yeah, the OP isn't exactly forthcoming with his reasoning.
 
  • #20
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$
In any case, the solution only applies to small oscillations. You will need an approximation somewhere.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Yes
 
  • #22
Note that ##w## is a constant, like ##M, g## and ##R## and is the fixed angular velocity at the equilibrium. ##r## and ##\dot \theta## are the variables. We have:
$$L = mR^2w = mr^2\dot \theta$$Also, with ##U(r) = Mgr##, we have:
$$\frac d{dt} U(r) = Mg\dot r$$And
$$\frac d {dt}\dot r^2 = 2\dot r \ddot r$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bling Fizikst
  • #23
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin :
1711305500535.png
 
  • #24
Bling Fizikst said:
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin : View attachment 342284
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
This was a new learning experience for me , so i don't really mind . But i do agree that one should try to solve problems on their own . At the end , it just matters that i learnt to solve it even if i had to look at the solution.
I just learnt a new technique and i am happy!

Also , i would love to thank you for patiently helping me throughout the problem 😇
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
919
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K