Are the Force Equations for Rotational Motion Accurate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the accuracy of force equations in rotational motion, specifically for blocks with masses ##m## and ##M##. The user initially struggles with deriving the correct equations of motion, leading to confusion regarding potential energy ##U(r)## and its relation to the system's dynamics. Key equations discussed include $$T - m r \omega^2 = m \ddot{r}$$ and $$Mg - T = M \ddot{r}$$, along with energy conservation expressed as $$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} + U(r) = E$$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding Lagrangian mechanics and the relationship between angular momentum and energy in solving these problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and angular momentum
  • Knowledge of potential energy functions in mechanical systems
  • Basic calculus for differentiating energy equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lagrangian equations of motion
  • Learn how to express potential energy functions for various mechanical systems
  • Explore the relationship between angular momentum and energy conservation
  • Practice solving problems involving small oscillations in rotational systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as engineers and researchers working with rotational systems and energy conservation principles.

Bling Fizikst
Messages
119
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
refer to image
Relevant Equations
refer to image
Screenshot 2024-03-24 212556.png


Writing force equations for block ##m## : $$T-mr\omega^2=m\ddot{r}$$ and for block ##M## : $$Mg-T=M\ddot{r}$$ I think there are mistakes in my equations as they are leading to nowhere and morever i think force methods are really risky in this regard . It would be better to write the total energy of the system which i don't know how to . I tried to write $$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
 
PeroK said:
Have you done any Lagrangian mechanics?
No
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Bling Fizikst said:
No
It should come out from conservation of AM and energy. You're aiming for an equation for ##\ddot r##. Which you should be able to get from:

Bling Fizikst said:
$$\frac{1}{2}m\dot{r}^2 +\frac{1}{2}M\dot{r}^2 + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2} +U(r)=E$$ where ##L=mR^2\omega##
 
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
 
PeroK said:
... differentiating the energy equation should work.
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
 
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)##
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
 
PeroK said:
You should be able to express that in terms of ##r##.
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
 
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
What precisely is stopping you from writing down an expression for ##U(r)##?
 
  • #10
Bling Fizikst said:
Need help on this , really deadstuck . Writing forces and using ##\frac{-\partial U}{\partial r}=F## doesn't seem to help?
How does the position of the mass M depend on ##r##? Take ##r = R## as the zero point.
 
  • #11
Is it -Mgr:nb)
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
Bling Fizikst said:
Is it -Mgr:nb)
What happens to ##M## as ##r## increases?
 
  • #13
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way . It gives me the wrong ans anyways , so it is wrong
 
  • #14
Bling Fizikst said:
it goes up so +Mgr? please forgive me if i am acting dumb , this is my first time using the potential energy function in this way
Yes. Note that ##Mg## is related to ##L## by the initial equilibrium.
 
  • #15
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
 
  • #16
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$ $$\implies \omega'=\sqrt{\frac{3m\omega^2}{m+M}}$$
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
 
  • #17
PeroK said:
That's the right answer, but I'm not sure quite how you got there.
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
 
  • #18
vela said:
##F = -kr## implies ##\omega = \sqrt{k/m}##.
No need to consider only small oscillations?
 
  • #19
Oh, you were asking about the steps preceding that last step. Yeah, the OP isn't exactly forthcoming with his reasoning.
 
  • #20
Bling Fizikst said:
I did that but how do i deal with the potential energy of the system : ##U(r)## $$(m+M)\ddot{r}-\frac{L^2}{mr^3}+U'(r)=0$$
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Bling Fizikst said:
$$(m+M)\ddot{r} -mr\omega^2- 2mr\omega^2=0$$
In any case, the solution only applies to small oscillations. You will need an approximation somewhere.
 
  • #21
PeroK said:
I wonder whether you replaced ##L^2## with ##mr^2w## here? To get from the above equation to this:
Yes
 
  • #22
Note that ##w## is a constant, like ##M, g## and ##R## and is the fixed angular velocity at the equilibrium. ##r## and ##\dot \theta## are the variables. We have:
$$L = mR^2w = mr^2\dot \theta$$Also, with ##U(r) = Mgr##, we have:
$$\frac d{dt} U(r) = Mg\dot r$$And
$$\frac d {dt}\dot r^2 = 2\dot r \ddot r$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bling Fizikst
  • #23
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin :
1711305500535.png
 
  • #24
Bling Fizikst said:
Anyways , i found a really elegant solution in David Morin : View attachment 342284
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
 
  • #25
PeroK said:
The idea is that you do these problems yourself. Not just to find a solution online.
This was a new learning experience for me , so i don't really mind . But i do agree that one should try to solve problems on their own . At the end , it just matters that i learnt to solve it even if i had to look at the solution.
I just learnt a new technique and i am happy!

Also , i would love to thank you for patiently helping me throughout the problem 😇
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
961
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
890
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K