Are the Rows of an Invertible Matrix Linearly Independent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff1evesque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion confirms that the rows of an invertible matrix are also linearly independent, in addition to its columns. This is supported by the invertible matrix theorem, which states that if a matrix is invertible, its inverse has linearly independent columns, implying the rows of the original matrix are likewise independent. The determinant relationship, where \det(A) = \det(A^{T}), further reinforces this conclusion. Additionally, while the row space and column space are distinct, they are connected through the rank-nullity theorem. Thus, both rows and columns of an invertible matrix form a linearly independent set.
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
The invertible matrix theorem states that the columns of the given matrix form a linearly independent set. Can we argue that the rows of the same matrix also forms a linearly independent set? If a matrix is invertible, then inverse of a given matrix A^{-1} has it's columns being linearly independent (for A^{-1}) which is equivalent to the rows of A being linearly independent. So can we say that both the rows and columns of A form a linearly independent set?

Thanks,

JL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Keep in mind that \det(A) = \det(A^{T}), hence every portion of the invertible matrix theorem automatically applies to the rows as well as the columns. You should come to see that there is a relationship between the row space and the column space of a matrix, along with the null space, called the rank-nullity theorem.

Note that the space spanned by the rows is different then the space spanned by the columns since row vectors live in a different vector space than the column vectors. (You will find that there is an isomorphism between the two spaces if the matrix is n x n.)
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K