Are the S' Axes Nonorthogonal in a Spacetime Diagram?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the S' axes, x' and ct', are nonorthogonal in a spacetime diagram, starting from the condition that t = t' = 0 when x = x' = 0. Participants emphasize the importance of using the Lorentz transformations and suggest that a diagram is essential for visualizing the problem. One user initially struggles with the concept but later confirms they have solved it after class instruction, which involved trigonometry. There is also a request for the solution from another participant, indicating a need for clarity on the topic. The conversation highlights the connection between theoretical understanding and practical application in spacetime diagrams.
Broseidon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the S' axes, x' and ct', are nonorthogonal in a spacetime diagram. Assume that t = t' = 0 when x = x' = 0. (Hint: use the fact that the ct' axis is the world line of the origin of S' to show that the ct' axis is inclined with respect to the ct' axis. Next, note that the world line of a light pulse moving in the +x direction starting out at x = 0 and ct = 0 is described by the equation x = +ct in S and x' = ct' in S').


Homework Equations


-The Lorentz transformations
-Relativistic velocity transformation


The Attempt at a Solution


I know it isn't much (and maybe foolish), but I felt like I didn't have much to go on about, so I tried trigonometry and somehow obtain an expression for sin not equal to one (or cosine not equal to zero).


All help is appreciated, and thank you in advance! (:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Bro and welcome to PF. Suppose I don't know what S and S' stand for ?
Also: check the phrase "ct' axis is inclined with respect to the ct' axis".

You may suppose someone wanting to help you is familiar with the Lorentz transformations. My first impression is that you don't need velocity transformation formulas.

The problem asks you to show something in a diagram. So your attempt at a solution should be a diagram or a (fairly detailed, you know: 1 pic = 1k words...) description of a diagram.

There is no reason to feel like you don't have much to go on: this is asking for something you are supposed to have learned in the material preceding the exercise...

I'm turning in, but there are others to help you as well. Help them a little, please!
 
Dear BvU,
I am fortunate enough to have solved it. I thank you for being willing to help. (: The professor solved it in class and it indeed involves some trigonometry.
 
do you have the solution. i need it pleaase:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
6K
Back
Top