Worldlines and spacetime diagrams

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of worldlines and spacetime diagrams in the context of special relativity. The original poster presents a scenario involving an observer on a spaceship undergoing proper acceleration and the subsequent behavior of a radio beacon dropped from the ship. The problem requires drawing spacetime diagrams and analyzing the relationships between the observer and the beacon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss rearranging equations related to the observer's worldline and the beacon's behavior upon release. There are attempts to clarify the assumptions regarding the beacon's motion after being dropped, with some questioning the validity of using Newtonian kinematics in a relativistic context.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's attempts, confirming certain aspects of their reasoning while also raising questions about the assumptions made regarding the beacon's motion. There is an ongoing exploration of how to accurately represent the events on the spacetime diagram, with multiple interpretations being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the initial conditions of the beacon's release and its implications for the spacetime diagram. There is also mention of the need to clarify the relationship between the observer's proper time and the coordinates in the inertial reference frame.

alc95
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An observer on the bridge of a spaceship is undergoing a proper acceleration a, so that the
observer’s worldline expressed in terms of the coordinates of an inertial reference frame S
is given by
t(\tau)=(c/a)\sinh(a\tau/c)x(\tau)=(c^2/a)\sinh(a\tau/c)
(a) Draw on a spacetime diagram for the reference frame S the worldline of the observer
for tau > 0.
At the instant tau = 0 a radio beacon is dropped off by the observer. At the instant of being
dropped off, the beacon is at rest relative to the observer. At this instant the beacon also
starts emitting at regular intervals (according to a clock on the beacon) a series of very short
pulses towards the observer.
Consider the signal pulse emitted at a time tE in the reference frame S.

(b) Draw on the spacetime diagram of part (a) the worldline of the beacon. Hence show
that this emission event has the spacetime cordinates (ct_E,x_E)=(ct_E,c^2/a)
(c) Show that the spacetime displacement of this emission event with respect to the origin
of S is given by the four vector
<br /> \textbf{s}_E=ct_E\textbf{e}_0+(c^2/a)\textbf{e}_1<br />
(d) Draw on the spacetime diagram the world line of the pulse emitted at time tE:

Homework Equations


<br /> (\cosh(x))^2-(\sinh(x))^2=1<br />

A four vector is defined as:
<br /> \textbf{s}=\Delta ct\textbf{e}_0+\Delta x\textbf{e}_1+\Delta y\textbf{e}_2+\Delta z\textbf{e}_3<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)
Rearranging the given equations:
\sinh(a\tau/c)=at/c\cosh(a\tau/c)=ax/c^2
Substituting into the relation between sinh and cosh:
(ax/c^2)^2-(at/c)^2=1(a^2x^2-a^2c^2t^2)/c^4=1x^2=c^2t^2+c^4/a^2 (1)

(b)
when tau=0:
t(0)=0x(0)=c^2/a
this part I'm not so sure of, but here is what I did:
using the equation of motion x_f=x_i+ut+(1/2)at^2x = -½ac^2t^2 + c^2/a
rearranging:
ct=\sqrt{(c^2/a-x)/(a/2)} (2)

I'm not quite sure of my solutions for (a) and (b). Assuming I have the correct equations (1) and (2), all that remains is to plot them on the same plot of ct vs x?

(c)
substituting the spacetime coordinates (ct_E,c^2/a) into the definition of a four-vector:
<br /> \textbf{s}_E=(ct_E-0)\textbf{e}_0+(c^2/a-0)\textbf{e}_1+(0-0)\textbf{e}_2+(0-0)\textbf{e}_3=ct_E\textbf{e}_0+c^2/a\textbf{e}_1<br />

(d)
For this part I'm assuming that I have to draw a straight line of slope 1 or -1, intersecting the wordline of the beacon at an arbitrary time coordinate t_E, such that it also intersects the wordline of the observer. Is this correct?

Any help would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alc95 said:
(a) Rearranging the given equations:
\sinh(a\tau/c)=at/c\cosh(a\tau/c)=ax/c^2
Substituting into the relation between sinh and cosh:
(ax/c^2)^2-(at/c)^2=1(a^2x^2-a^2c^2t^2)/c^4=1x^2=c^2t^2+c^4/a^2
This is fine.

(b) when tau=0:
t(0)=0x(0)=c^2/a
this part I'm not so sure of, but here is what I did:
using the equation of motion x_f=x_i+ut+(1/2)at^2x = -½ac^2t^2 + c^2/a
rearranging:
ct=\sqrt{(c^2/a-x)/(a/2)}
First, why do you expect the beacon to accelerate once it's released from the ship, because that's what you're assuming here? Second, what's ##u##? Did you set it to 0? Third, are you sure the Newtonian kinematic equations are valid here? After all, this is a special relativity problem.

I'd start by finding the velocity of the beacon when it's released.

Assuming I have the correct equations (1) and (2), all that remains is to plot them on the same plot of ct vs x?
Yes.

(d)
For this part I'm assuming that I have to draw a straight line of slope 1 or -1, intersecting the wordline of the beacon at an arbitrary time coordinate t_E, such that it also intersects the wordline of the observer. Is this correct?
The slope will be ##\pm 1##, but the line may or may not intersect with the world line of the observer.
 
Thanks for your reply :)

Here is what I have come up with for part (b):
I have already worked out the coordinates for the release of the beacon as (x,ct)=(c^2/a,0). So the worldline of the beacon intersects that of the ship at that point. Now, as you pointed out, the beacon would not necessarily accelerate upon release. So, would it be a straight line that is tangent to the point of release on the ship's wordline? My reasoning for this is that since it is at rest relative to the ship at that instant, their velocities would be equal at that point when plotted on the spacetime diagram.

I'm fairly sure that my part (c) is correct. Could you confirm this?
 
alc95 said:
Here is what I have come up with for part (b):
I have already worked out the coordinates for the release of the beacon as (x,ct)=(c^2/a,0). So the worldline of the beacon intersects that of the ship at that point. Now, as you pointed out, the beacon would not necessarily accelerate upon release. So, would it be a straight line that is tangent to the point of release on the ship's wordline? My reasoning for this is that since it is at rest relative to the ship at that instant, their velocities would be equal at that point when plotted on the spacetime diagram.
Sounds good.

I'm fairly sure that my part (c) is correct. Could you confirm this?
Looks good too.
 
For the spacetime diagram in Q1, I got a wordline for the beacon as a straight vertical line, intersecting that of ship at x=c^2/a. I'm not quite sure about this.

Problem statement
Q1
(e) The pulse is received by the observer at the observer’s proper time R. Show that this
event can be represented, with respect to the origin of S, by the position four vector
<br /> s_R=(c^2/a)(\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_0+\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_1)<br />

(f) The world line of the pulse (consisting of zero-rest mass particles) can then be parameterised
in terms of the affine parameter as
<br /> s(\lambda)=s_E (1-\lambda)+s_R\lambda<br />
Write down the four-velocity u of this pulse.

(g) Using the fact that u is a null vector, show that u0 = u1.

(h) Using the result of part (g), show that the time of reception of the pulse will be given
by:
<br /> \tau_R=-(c/a)\ln{(1-at_E/c)}<br />

Attempt at a solution
Q1
(e)
I had no issues with this part.

(f)
subbing in s_E and s_R and evaluating, assuming my algebra is correct:
<br /> s(\lambda)=(ct_E(1-\lambda)+\lambda(c^2/a)\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)})\textbf{e}_0+((c^2/a)(1-\lambda)+\lambda(c^2/a)\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}))\textbf{e}_1<br />
then, the four-velocity is, by differentiating:
<br /> \textbf{u}=(\lambda c)(\cosh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_0+\sinh{(a\tau_R/c)}\textbf{e}_1)<br />

(g)
for a null vector the absolute value should be 0:
<br /> \sqrt{(u_0)^2+(u_1)^2}=0<br />
<br /> \pm((u_0)^2+(u_1)^2)=0<br />

(h) I am not sure how to use the result of part (g) when solving for tau_R. Is the idea to substitute this into the four-vector derived in part (f)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K