Undergrad Are there non-smooth metrics for spacetime (without singularities)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses the existence of non-smooth metrics for spacetime that do not involve singularities. It establishes that local Lorentz symmetry, a fundamental principle in General Relativity (GR), cannot be maintained in non-smooth spacetimes without leading to violations of the equivalence principle. The consensus is that any non-smooth spacetime would inherently lead to geodesic incompleteness, thus resulting in singularities, which contradicts the quest for non-singular models. Ultimately, the conclusion is that no compatible models of non-smooth spacetimes exist within the framework of current physical theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) and its principles
  • Familiarity with local Lorentz symmetry and its implications
  • Knowledge of geodesics and geodesic incompleteness
  • Concept of diffeomorphism and general covariance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of local Lorentz invariance in General Relativity
  • Explore the concept of geodesic incompleteness in spacetime
  • Investigate models of spacetime singularities and their characteristics
  • Study the role of diffeomorphism in the context of GR and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and researchers interested in the foundations of General Relativity, spacetime geometry, and the implications of singularities in theoretical physics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Are there non-smooth metrics for spacetime (that don't involve singularities)?
Are there non-smooth metrics for spacetime (that don't involve singularities)?

I found this statement in a discussion about the application of local Lorentz symmetry in spacetime metrics:

Lorentz invariance holds locally in GR, but you're right that it no longer applies globally when gravity gets involved. While in SR, quantities maintain Lorentz (or Poincare) symmetry via Lorentz (or Poincare) transforms, in GR they obey general covariance which is symmetry under arbitrary differentiable and invertible transformations (aka diffeomorphism).
If a spacetime was not smooth, and didn't allow local Lorentz symmetry, it would break the principle of equivalence which is the bedrock assumption in GR.


I would like to know if there are possible spacetimes where they would not be smooth. The only problem is that this usually involves singularities. Are there models or metrics of non smooth spacetimes that would be compatible with what we currently know in physics but that don't necessarily involve singularities?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
I found this statement in a discussion
Where? Please give a reference.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
I'm trying to figure out what a non-smooth spacetime is supposed to be if it is not singular at the discontinuities.
 
Last edited:
In GR, the primary definition of singularity is geodesic incompleteness. A point of spacetime where all derivatives are undefined while continuity exists must lead to geodesic incompleteness, since geodesics require satisfaction of a differential equation. So such points necessarily lead to spacetime singularities as defined in GR.

As to the question: "Are there models or metrics of non smooth spacetimes that would be compatible with what we currently know in physics", irrespective of singularities, the answer must be no. As your quote notes, local Lorentz invariance would be violated, and all currently accepted theories require this, and all data are consistent with this.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
917
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K