MHB Are These Vectors Linearly Dependent?

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Are the vectors
$$\left[
\begin{array}{r}
2\\1\\-2
\end{array}\right]
,\quad
\left[\begin{array}{r}
0\\2\\-2
\end{array}\right]
,\quad
\left[\begin{array}{r}
2\\3\\-4
\end{array}\right]
$$
linearly dependent or linearly independent?
$$\left[ \begin{array}{rrr|r} 2 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 & 3 & 0 \\ -2 & -2 & -4 & 0 \end{array} \right]
\sim
\left[ \begin{array}{rrr|r} 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right]$$
I assume this is independent due to trivial answers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: 12.1

By the definition of "linearly dependent", these vectors are linearly dependent if and only if there exist three number, a, b, and c, not all 0, such that
a\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 1 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix}+ b\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 2 \\ -2 \end{bmatrix}+ c\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 3 \\ -4\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}2a+ 2c \\ a+ 2b+ 3c \\ -2a- 2b- 4c \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}.

That is, 2a+ 2c= 0, a+ 2b+ 3c= 0, -2a- 2b- 4c= 0. From 2a+ 2c= 0, c= -a so the last two equations are a+ 2b- 3a= 2b- 2a= 0 and -2a- 2b+ 4c= 2a- 2b= 0. Both of those give a= b. Any numbers a, b, and c, such that b= a, c= -a will work.

So, yes, these vectors are linearly dependent.

You should think about two questions. What definition of "linearly independent" and "linearly dependent" did you learn? And what was your purpose in row reducing a matrix having the vectors as columns if you had to ask if the vectors were linearly dependent when you finished?
 
Re: 12.1

I pretty much just followed an example
But probably could solve some of these just by observation
they used augmented matrix but only did some alteration
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/9045
 
Last edited:
I edited the thread title. The original title of "12.1" wasn't of much use to describe the topic. :)
 
Thank you

I tried also to change it

But when I submitted it didn't happen
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
967
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top