News Are UAW Union Bosses Abusing Their Positions for Pay?

[baywax]

Our modern electronics are moving us in the right direction, get in, turn the key, and go. We will always have need for petroleum, it just needs to be separated from our basic driving needs.

Yes, where would we be without nylon, plastic and vaseline?

 

[mgb_phys]

Yes, where would we be without nylon, plastic and vaseline?

All alone on saturday night?

 

[JasonRox]

My brother is a foreman for a company that produces custom extruded plastic products, and they will lose some business if the big 3 fail. They are a nimble and innovative little company, though, and they will survive. The gloom-and-doom scenario foisted by cheerleaders of the big 3 is unrealistic and short-sighted. This country went through WWII with severely truncated domestic industrial production, curtailed consumer spending, etc. and we did OK. Those of us who grew up in the 1950s know that even single-earner families with plenty of kids can do OK. We can do it again and recover from this downturn, as long as we don't let crooked and under-performing companies hold a gun to our heads demanding bailouts.

The money doled out to the financial entities has not resulted in economic relief in the "real world", nor will a big-3 bailout. It's just socialism for the rich, in which profit is privatized and risk is socialized. As a fiscal conservative, I am glad to see that enough Republicans were willing to try to kill the automotive bail-out, though I am sorely disappointed that they showed no such spine when hedge-funds and exotic derivatives proved to be so toxic.

I'm glad your on the same page.

The pain will be worth it.

 

[Topher925]

But then you wouldn't have the tiny butt and muscular thighs of us real cyclists - so you would have to buy an F350 to impress women - so back to square one.

 

[mheslep]

Have you looked at the cost per mile of a Prius vs. an Accord? The Prius is only economically viable if the cost of gas is in the $4 dollar range. To build a 20,000 lbs. lead acid powered truck would just be asinine.

Well lowering the price/gallon extends the payback time, maybe making it infinite. A Prius supposedly takes http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/environment/2008-05-11-hybrids-gas-prices_N.htm". Double that to 76k mi for $1.80/gal. There are some stupidly expensive hybrids that would require 200k miles to theoretically break even (which because of the time value of money, really, it never does).

 

[DrClapeyron]

Unions will definitely lose their pension funds if the so called Big Three are not bailed out. This bail out means giving money to the automakers to make payments to unions who can make pension payments to their retired members.

The largest pension funds in this country are taking huge hits which means current benefactors must take the hit. California's Calpers lost some $40 billion dollars within the past 6 months, 20% of the fund's total value.

Automakers can definitely operate in debt, no doubt about it, our country operates in debt and has done so for almost 20 years. Why bail out now? A mass explosion of retirements brought on by the baby boomer generation will force both higher pension fund payouts and higher social security payouts. That was the hot topic of the 1990's, social security reform, and we've been seeing it in the news for at least the past 10 years that automakers (and other industrials ie airlines) cannot make the outrageous payments to pension funds (or unions) and not indebt themselves. We saw this one heading from a mile away.

I guess it comes down to this: how much do you love grandpa?

 

[Proton Soup]

I guess it comes down to this: how much do you love grandpa?

all of my grandparents are dead. they can draw social security, just like lots of other people's grandparents.

 

[baywax]

All alone on saturday night?

Or talking to the robot made of hemp products.

 

[BobG]

Unions will definitely lose their pension funds if the so called Big Three are not bailed out. This bail out means giving money to the automakers to make payments to unions who can make pension payments to their retired members.

The largest pension funds in this country are taking huge hits which means current benefactors must take the hit. California's Calpers lost some $40 billion dollars within the past 6 months, 20% of the fund's total value.

Automakers can definitely operate in debt, no doubt about it, our country operates in debt and has done so for almost 20 years. Why bail out now? A mass explosion of retirements brought on by the baby boomer generation will force both higher pension fund payouts and higher social security payouts. That was the hot topic of the 1990's, social security reform, and we've been seeing it in the news for at least the past 10 years that automakers (and other industrials ie airlines) cannot make the outrageous payments to pension funds (or unions) and not indebt themselves. We saw this one heading from a mile away.

I guess it comes down to this: how much do you love grandpa?

all of my grandparents are dead. they can draw social security, just like lots of other people's grandparents.

Actually, if the Big-3 bails on the pensions, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation picks up the tab. That results in a reduction of pension benefits for the highest paid employees. There's also a worry that the PBGC could run out of money in a major economic crisis since it's currently underfunded. That means the government could still wind up bailing out autoworker pensions even if Congress doesn't approve the bailout (it would still be a lot less than the bailout unless we're talking a Great Depression type crisis where lots of companies fail.

The impact of reduced car sales are already being felt. Atmel in Colorado Springs just laid off 11% of its workers yesterday, in addition to the workers they laid off in France. They make memory chips and microcontrollers, with demand for microcontrollers used in automobiles down substantially. This is in response to reduced car sales in general, not the chance of the big-3 folding.

It was my daughter's first experience with company layoffs. She didn't get laid off, but they used a pretty brutal method to lay folks off. They all gathered in one room and if they called your name, you still had a job and should head back to the production area. If they didn't call your name, they'd escort you down to the HR department to pick up your severance pay on your way immediately out the door (without passing Go). Getting her name called somewhere in the middle gave her the chance to experience both ends: first watching the chances of having a job slowly decrease with each person that left the room and then waiting in the production area to see who showed up and who didn't.

I think that's a pretty cruel way of doing things. When the company I worked for laid people off, they actually talked to them privately before announcing the lay offs to the rest of the workers. They also let everyone know about three weeks before the lay offs (actually, it was supposed to be a month before, but I worked for a subcontractor and the manager quit, followed by my company being stripped from the contract completely, so there were some delays). There's always a chance a company is going to want those workers back someday, if possible, so doing things with a little dignity has some advantages.

 

[RonL]

You're not an engineer are you Ron? Bigger size doesn't mean longer lasting. It means more money and more weight. We don't have options for electric/hybrid vehicles for most cars because its very expensive. Have you looked at the cost per mile of a Prius vs. an Accord? The Prius is only economically viable if the cost of gas is in the $4 dollar range. To build a 20,000 lbs. lead acid powered truck would just be asinine.



Whats so challenging about riding a bike without electric power? I ride my bike uphill, and into the wind to school every day the whether is permitting. Its great exercise, saves money, saves gas, and is better for the environment. If my bike had a full enclosure around it I would ride it to school every day.

I certainly didn't think anyone was mistaking me for a professional or degreed engineer I am neither, and would not even make the claim of being a good one, but having worked alone with heavy equipment, I have saved quite a bit of money over the years by working with things laying around or putting together things that assist lifting and moving, and working where most people would pay some service company to come in and perform the effort.
If a need for 5hp is present and all that is at hand are two 3.5hp motors, they are coupled together and deliver power to do the job, is that not engineering? I have spent a fair amount of money buying things to play with and with no expectation of a return on my investment, there is a goal but no timeline imposed as it's for the most part, just fun stuff.

A warrenty on the big rigs covers some things for up to 500,000 miles, not sure where bearings and brakes fall in, but I have never replaced bearings on any large truck I have operated, but then I didn't drive over the road long hauls.

I don't ride the bike much, so the challange for me starts about two blocks from the house

 

[Proton Soup]

I think that's a pretty cruel way of doing things. When the company I worked for laid people off, they actually talked to them privately before announcing the lay offs to the rest of the workers. They also let everyone know about three weeks before the lay offs (actually, it was supposed to be a month before, but I worked for a subcontractor and the manager quit, followed by my company being stripped from the contract completely, so there were some delays). There's always a chance a company is going to want those workers back someday, if possible, so doing things with a little dignity has some advantages.

it sounds like they are afraid of their employees. thing is, when the people who remain see this, they will just view the employer as hostile. when those people find new jobs and leave Atmel, there will be no basis for giving advance notice. you just leave, because that's the same courtesy the company gives its employees.

 

[WhoWee]

This is real innovation...

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/02/the-venture-one.php

but it has to pretend to be a motorcycle to evade safety standards (even though it's priced at $20,000)...I'd buy one for $10,000.

 

[mgb_phys]

Or VW's 2 seater 235mpg version

http://www.canadiandriver.com/articles/gw/vw1litre.htm

 

[RonL]

This might be of interest to some, I had no idea so many companies had attempted electric cars and trucks, and how little power was used for most (2-6hp).

http://earlyelectric.com/carcompanies.html

Did not find the link intended, when I started the search.

 

[OmCheeto]

Somehow I doubt good o' Myles, all on his lonesome, built one that would last 10 years without battery replacement, would take 5000 charge cycles, had regenerative braking, and had 40 miles+ battery range without 1000 lbs of batteries.

It's a plug in electric hybrid, just like the Volt. He actually didn't build the vehicle. It was built by Sam McKinney in 1988. Myles only converted the means of propulsion.

He says that 4 of his 12 batteries were manufactured in 1999.
So 1/3 of his bank of batteries will have survived your 10 year replacement requirement.

I haven't asked him how many cycles his batteries have been through, nor his nominal depth of discharge, which would yield a theoretical number of cycles.

His vehicle has a pure electric range of between 16 and 100 miles, depending on load.

He uses 744 pounds of lead acid batteries.

I don't think regenerative braking would work on his boat. Although in the spring, the river current past his marina can be quite swift and I'm sure that with a bit of tinkering, we could convert his motor into a 24 hour power source. (It has a permanent magnet dc motor)

Oh and it seats 16. How many hybrid electrics can boast that number.

 

[mheslep]

It's a plug in electric hybrid, just like the Volt. He actually didn't build the vehicle. It was built by Sam McKinney in 1988. Myles only converted the means of propulsion.

He says that 4 of his 12 batteries were manufactured in 1999.
So 1/3 of his bank of batteries will have survived your 10 year replacement requirement.

I haven't asked him how many cycles his batteries have been through, nor his nominal depth of discharge, which would yield a theoretical number of cycles.

His vehicle has a pure electric range of between 16 and 100 miles, depending on load.

He uses 744 pounds of lead acid batteries.

I don't think regenerative braking would work on his boat. Although in the spring, the river current past his marina can be quite swift and I'm sure that with a bit of tinkering, we could convert his motor into a 24 hour power source. (It has a permanent magnet dc motor)

Oh and it seats 16. How many hybrid electrics can boast that number.

Its a boat? Ok, I didn't get that you were being tongue in cheek.

His vehicle has a pure electric range of between 16 and 100 miles, depending on load.

And the tide/current.

 

[BobG]

it sounds like they are afraid of their employees. thing is, when the people who remain see this, they will just view the employer as hostile. when those people find new jobs and leave Atmel, there will be no basis for giving advance notice. you just leave, because that's the same courtesy the company gives its employees.

That's common practice for any level of job at most companies. Hence career advisors recommending employees always have an updated resume, that they maintain a network of friends and former bosses that can help them find a job, and always have enough savings to get you through a few months without a job (the last helping to explain why even the threat of a bad economy becomes self-fulfilling; people stop spending and start saving when that prospect starts to look a little more realistic).

No loyalty either way. Employees that need inputs on their resumes more than they need long term company health (and managers are employees, too).

It creates embarrassing situations, too.

In my work environment, you have defense contractors with a lot of subcontractors on each project. Generally, when a company loses a contract, the people doing the actual work just move to the company that won the contract (with some cleaning out of dead wood, of course - it's hard to get rid of the employees doing just enough to not get fired, so a change in contractors can be a good thing). That constant movement of employees back and forth between companies is why my company and some others try not to create grudges. A few folks take a while to learn how things work.

A friend of mine had his company, a subcontractor, fired off a project. The supervisor for the prime contractor was surprisingly happy to be ordering the subcontractor employees to pack up their stuff and leave. Unfortunately (or fortunately) for the prime supervisor, my friend called his supervisor at his own company before leaving. When the supervisor for the prime contractor came back and asked why the subcontractor employee hadn't left yet, the guy replied, "Because I work for you now. You're my new supervisor. You still want me to take the day off?" Half the guys the supervisor was kicking out of the office had been picked up by his own company and now worked for the supervisor. Doh! Tough way to establish that supervisor/employee respect and rapport. That would have made a better cell phone commercial than that stupid girl jumping around the room for Michael Phelps!

 

[baywax]

This might be of interest to some, I had no idea so many companies had attempted electric cars and trucks, and how little power was used for most (2-6hp).

http://earlyelectric.com/carcompanies.html

Did not find the link intended, when I started the search.

Obviously Americans have been way ahead of the curve for over 100 years.

 

[mheslep]

WOW!

Just look at all those High Speed, Long Distance machines. I can just about rest my case.

What case? Here's one, 155km/h top speed, 40 liter tank. What do you want?
http://www.tatacarsworldwide.com/products/indigo-sw.asp

 

[mheslep]

http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=32966

http://www.epi.org/briefingpapers/227/bp227.pdf

I read the EPI paper. It appears to be mostly a panic piece for saving the industry, rather than a research article.

EPI does not provide any evidence that 3.3 million jobs will be in fact be lost if one or more Detroit firms files for Chap. 11., as you quoted. They arrive at the 3.3m figure merely by counting up jobs as follows:
-all direct jobs from the big 3
-all indirect jobs (suppliers) to the big 3
-all non-domestic auto makers! Yes, they're including Toyota-US, etc.
-a very large multiplier in the economy at large, that is lost jobs from reduced income by auto related people. This last multiplier is far greater than all the above auto related jobs.
They call this a 'total industry shutdown', which would cost 3.3m jobs. They even include, a stoppage of imports from other countries in that figure! [See foot note 3 where they call it a far fetched idea]. Their words:

The third scenario [the 3.3m jobs] ]assumes that the entire U.S. light vehicle assembly industry, including foreign-owned assembly operations (so-called transplants), shuts down.

It is the wildest hand waving to suggest this would actually happen. They have to show where Chapter 11 would actual force the companies to cease operations, vs go into conservator-ship. They provide no evidence of this major issue at all, but cite a New Yorker piece. BTW, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1a2e2042-c79f-11dd-b611-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1", among others, says they will not shut down if they enter Chap. 11.

The figure they cite for a GM only shutdown is 53,200 direct jobs. This much is well sourced by the labor bureau, and is credible, IF GM shuts down. Then the list 284,000 indirect jobs for GM in immediately connected business (suppliers). Yes it is credible that this many people are involved in supplying GM; it is not credible that 100% of this figure will lose their jobs IF GM shuts down. Their 'respending' figure for GM, the ripple through the economy, is 576,700. Well perhaps, but every job lost in every industry has a ripple effect, but this does not justify the government picking winners.

The EPI assertion that the foreign-owned domestic manufacturers will also shutdown, without evidence, is ridiculous.

 

[RonL]

What case? Here's one, 155km/h top speed, 40 liter tank. What do you want?
http://www.tatacarsworldwide.com/products/indigo-sw.asp

I guess the attempt at humor did not turn out so well.
The case I have been trying to make is that a full sized Pickup or SUV offers the comfort and options most people want in their transportation, and a speed of 45mph (maybe 55) and a range of 75 miles per charge will meet the needs of nearly all drivers in any given day (intercity and urban population).

The WOW! comment at your last link, was about the picture of all the lanes of traffic stopped or just barley moving, this is how so many people spend the greater part of their commute around towns and the top speed of 45mph is what's posted on most streets other than loops and expressways.

Just a couple of my thoughts, so I'll leave it at that.

 

[drankin]

I guess the attempt at humor did not turn out so well.
The case I have been trying to make is that a full sized Pickup or SUV offers the comfort and options most people want in their transportation, and a speed of 45mph (maybe 55) and a range of 75 miles per charge will meet the needs of nearly all drivers in any given day (intercity and urban population).

The WOW! comment at your last link, was about the picture of all the lanes of traffic stopped or just barley moving, this is how so many people spend the greater part of their commute around towns and the top speed of 45mph is what's posted on most streets other than loops and expressways.

Just a couple of my thoughts, so I'll leave it at that.

What would convince most of those commuters to drive an electric car? That's the question that really matters. Just because it can be done doesn't mean people will buy into it.

 

[baywax]

What would convince most of those commuters to drive an electric car? That's the question that really matters. Just because it can be done doesn't mean people will buy into it.

$4.00 usd per litre of guzzoline?

 

[RonL]

What would convince most of those commuters to drive an electric car? That's the question that really matters. Just because it can be done doesn't mean people will buy into it.

I think the single solution needed is a recharge in less than 10 or 15 minutes.

 

[mheslep]

$4.00 usd per litre of guzzoline?

Add smog, pollution, noise. With all the hype on global warming it seems good old NOx and SOx auto pollution has almost been forgotten.

 

[turbo]

A friend of mine had his company, a subcontractor, fired off a project. The supervisor for the prime contractor was surprisingly happy to be ordering the subcontractor employees to pack up their stuff and leave. Unfortunately (or fortunately) for the prime supervisor, my friend called his supervisor at his own company before leaving. When the supervisor for the prime contractor came back and asked why the subcontractor employee hadn't left yet, the guy replied, "Because I work for you now. You're my new supervisor. You still want me to take the day off?"

Years back, I was hired by an architect for a very large (for Maine) apartment complex, and I was to inspect concrete, soil placement, framing, etc. As I found problems, I reported them to the superintendent of the prime contractor, who made the subcontractors fix the problems. The owner of the project told the architect to fire me because I was slowing up progress on his project. Friday afternoon, the architect flew in and handed me my last check. I went to the prime contractor's office trailer to say goodbye to the superintendent. He said "come back Monday". I showed up Monday morning and he made me the clerk of the project, in charge of payroll, supplies, and yes, quality inspections. Over the next two years, I was promoted to Assistant Superintendent, and Project Superintendent. Let me tell you that you don't want to be Project Super when it comes time to punchlist finished buildings for final turnover.

 

[drankin]

I think the single solution needed is a recharge in less than 10 or 15 minutes.

Wouldn't matter if it's 2 minutes.

-Your electric bill goes thru the roof (can our power grids even handle this?). What do people do if there's a power outage? Ride your bicycle in the snow?
-You have to buy a new, lesser performing car when the costs are compared.
-You have to have a second car if you need to go out of your driving range. Could you imagine running out of juice on a lonely highway? You can't go get a can of electrons to get you to the next station to plug-in.
-You have significant AC and heating power requirements that are always left out of the equation.

A hybrid is about is close as we'll get to compromise. We have to burn something to get the energy to move the masses. We should focus on clean burning fuels.

 

[WhoWee]

What case? Here's one, 155km/h top speed, 40 liter tank. What do you want?
http://www.tatacarsworldwide.com/products/indigo-sw.asp

These are the guys that are acquiring Jaguar

http://www.google.com/search?q=tata...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

don't be TOO surprised if they take a look at Saturn on some of the other brands.

As far as I can determine, they haven't lainched in the US yet?

 

[WhoWee]

Wouldn't matter if it's 2 minutes.

-Your electric bill goes thru the roof (can our power grids even handle this?). What do people do if there's a power outage? Ride your bicycle in the snow?
-You have to buy a new, lesser performing car when the costs are compared.
-You have to have a second car if you need to go out of your driving range. Could you imagine running out of juice on a lonely highway? You can't go get a can of electrons to get you to the next station to plug-in.
-You have significant AC and heating power requirements that are always left out of the equation.

A hybrid is about is close as we'll get to compromise. We have to burn something to get the energy to move the masses. We should focus on clean burning fuels.

Here's a little something to kick around...there's been a lot of discussion lately about the deficiencies of the existing power grid.

Sometinmes the way to solve a problem is to step back and look at the entire landscape.

Some of the givens:

1.) We want to drive electric cars, or propane cars, or hydrogen cars, etc., but we need a new way of fueling any of the new cars/trucks.
2.) We have a highway system that covers nearly the entire country.
3.) Trucks and cars are currently fueled differently (gas/diesel)
4.) Truck stops are located most often near the highway system.
5.) Most (natural) gas wells are located in the country...outside of cities.
6.) Compressed natural gas is dangerous to store/hold.
7.) The highway system has a lot of unused space (in most places)
8.) Many people consider the highway system an eyesore.
9.) Many people consider windmills an eyesore

Some ideas:
Trucks first;
1.) Semi trucks running on diesel use "middle of the barrel oil" which is expensive and (not clean). Alternatively, natural gas is cleaner and very abundant...and the wells and delivery trunk lines are out in the country...where the highways and truckstops and trucks are located (when not making deliveries to cities). Trucking in general has become capital-intensive and investment in infrastructure to support a compressed natural gas delivery system is do-able. Additionally, trucks have on-board storage capacity and perform well when fueled in this manner. Someone should be able to figure out how to put all of the pieces together.

Cars are more difficult;
We live and use cars in the city and drive long distances. A car fueling system has to be easy to use, dependable, safe and economical. If all we needed to do was plug our car in at night and make a 25mph/20 mile total daily commute...we'd have reasonable options now.
http://www.gemcar.com/models/

But most of us drive farther and want the freedom to travel when/where we choose...on the highway system.

HERE'S THE POINT...we have this enormous highway system with lot's of extra space, it connects to cities, it's already considered an eyesore, it obviously is where we drive...why not place wind-driven devices (eyesores also) and solar systems (especially Nano-solar technology) all along the highway system and connect into a new power grid. The first use of the power would be electric stations along the highway system and surplus could be directed to the existing grid. As for faster charge times...someone should be able soon enough to figure out how to charge batteries at power/service stations and swap vehicle batteries...much like we change propane tanks on our grills.

(I'd also like to open a conversation in another thread regarding the logistics and problems of capture/use of static energy into a power grid)

I'm not an engineer...it just makes sense to me that if the government is going to get into the car business and tackle the power grid...the problems might be considered together.

 

[edward]

I read the EPI paper. It appears to be mostly a panic piece for saving the industry, rather than a research article.

EPI does not provide any evidence that 3.3 million jobs will be in fact be lost if one or more Detroit firms files for Chap. 11., as you quoted. They arrive at the 3.3m figure merely by counting up jobs as follows:
-all direct jobs from the big 3
-all indirect jobs (suppliers) to the big 3
-all non-domestic auto makers! Yes, they're including Toyota-US, etc.
-a very large multiplier in the economy at large, that is lost jobs from reduced income by auto related people. This last multiplier is far greater than all the above auto related jobs.
They call this a 'total industry shutdown', which would cost 3.3m jobs. They even include, a stoppage of imports from other countries in that figure! [See foot note 3 where they call it a far fetched idea]. Their words:


It is the wildest hand waving to suggest this would actually happen. They have to show where Chapter 11 would actual force the companies to cease operations, vs go into conservator-ship. They provide no evidence of this major issue at all, but cite a New Yorker piece. BTW, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1a2e2042-c79f-11dd-b611-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1", among others, says they will not shut down if they enter Chap. 11.

The figure they cite for a GM only shutdown is 53,200 direct jobs. This much is well sourced by the labor bureau, and is credible, IF GM shuts down. Then the list 284,000 indirect jobs for GM in immediately connected business (suppliers). Yes it is credible that this many people are involved in supplying GM; it is not credible that 100% of this figure will lose their jobs IF GM shuts down. Their 'respending' figure for GM, the ripple through the economy, is 576,700. Well perhaps, but every job lost in every industry has a ripple effect, but this does not justify the government picking winners.

The EPI assertion that the foreign-owned domestic manufacturers will also shutdown, without evidence, is ridiculous.

My reply was in response to your statement:

Originally Posted by mheslep

Who says they are going 'down', vs into Chapter 11? And even if the GM and Chrysler closed shop, where do you get you the 'millions' figure (as in more than 2 million)?

If GM and Chrysler close shop it will probably be more than 2 million. You have to account for the fact that auto and auto industry support workers will not be spending money. There will be a snowball effect that people don't want to look at.

A significant concern is the snowball effect that a Detroit Three Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing would have on their highly interdependent supply base. Loss of outstanding receivables for some suppliers will mean their own filings, or even liquidation, which will impact every other car maker, including Toyota and Honda; 65 per cent of suppliers to the Detroit Three also supply the "Japan Three."

http://news.guelphmercury.com/article/413852