Are We Any Closer to a Unified Theory?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hadeka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Unified theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the quest for a unified theory in physics that could explain all known physical forces. Participants explore whether current scientific endeavors, such as those at the LHC, bring us closer to this goal or if the idea of unification is merely a philosophical aspiration without practical significance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the possibility of achieving a unified theory, citing historical patterns where significant discoveries often arise unexpectedly.
  • Others suggest that while unification may present an appealing simplicity, its practical importance might be lost on the general public.
  • A participant references Richard Feynman's perspective, arguing that knowledge accumulation implies we are closer to understanding unification, despite the complexity of the topic.
  • Concerns are raised about the public's ability to grasp the significance of advanced theories, such as string theory, and the potential for media misrepresentation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether we are closer to a unified theory. There are multiple competing views, with some believing we are making progress and others doubting the significance of such progress.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of public understanding and the challenges of communicating complex scientific ideas, which may affect perceptions of progress in the field.

hadeka
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Einstein was dreaming about theory of everything that unify all the known physical forces in just one theory ... Unfortunately, he died before his dream comes true ...

But nowadays, are we close to a real unified theory that explains the universe?
Or is it just a wishfull stupid metaphysical thinking?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think anyone can tell really, hopefully something will come out of the LHC.
 
Well, having read a bit about the general trends of physics and science in general over the past few centuries, I'm inclined to say no. First off, it seems that whenever we think we've got everything figured out, something big happens that no one can predict. Second, I'm not sure how much it matters. Unifying the physical forces is pretty nice to see an underlying simplicity and symmetry to the universe, but the event would likely pass unnoticed by anyone not in the field.
 
Nabeshin said:
Well, having read a bit about the general trends of physics and science in general over the past few centuries, I'm inclined to say no. First off, it seems that whenever we think we've got everything figured out, something big happens that no one can predict. Second, I'm not sure how much it matters. Unifying the physical forces is pretty nice to see an underlying simplicity and symmetry to the universe, but the event would likely pass unnoticed by anyone not in the field.


That person would or should get, at least, their 15 minutes of fame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_minutes_of_fame
 
rewebster said:
That person would or should get, at least, their 15 minutes of fame.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_minutes_of_fame

Agreed, but the general public would likely not understand the significance of the work. I find it difficult to imagine someone going on Jay Leno and discussing the finer points of string theory with him.
 
Nabeshin said:
Agreed, but the general public would likely not understand the significance of the work. I find it difficult to imagine someone going on Jay Leno and discussing the finer points of string theory with him.

It would surely be on the front page of the newspaper, though, with some snazzy headline that doesn't really have all that much to do with the theory, but will get people's attention.

To answer the OP: are we close? I don't know, and I don't think anyone does.
 
Nabeshin said:
Agreed, but the general public would likely not understand the significance of the work. I find it difficult to imagine someone going on Jay Leno and discussing the finer points of string theory with him.

Agree with you--

I think Charlie Rose is one of the most intuitive, well rounded interviewers on the tube, but when it came, even, to his interview with Lisa Randall, the look on his face during most of the interview was one of "what the hell is she talking about?"

http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2006/12/12/1/a-conversation-about-physics-with-lisa-randall



I was laughing through most of it --just from the expressions on HIS face (and some of the statements about ST/MWI/whatever)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hadeka said:
But nowadays, are we close to a real unified theory that explains the universe?
Or is it just a wishfull stupid metaphysical thinking?!

I'm compelled to quote James Gleick on Feynman:

“So we aren't any closer to unification than we were in Einstein's time?” the historian asked. Feynman grew angry. “It's a crazy question!...We're certainly closer. We know more. And if there's a finite amount to be known, we obviously must be closer to having the knowledge, okay? I don't know how to make this into a sensible question... It's all so stupid. All these interviews are always so damned useless.”

He rose from his desk and walked out the door and down the corridor, drumming his knuckles along the wall. The writer heard him shout, just before he disappeared: “It's goddamned useless to talk about these things! It's a complete waste of time! The history of these things is nonsense! You're trying to make something difficult and complicated out of something that's simple and beautiful.”

Across the hall Murray Gell-Mann looked out of his office. “I see you've met Dick,” he said.
 
"“So we aren't any closer to unification than we were in Einstein's time?” the historian asked. Feynman grew angry. “It's a crazy question!...We're certainly closer. We know more. And if there's a finite amount to be known, we obviously must be closer to having the knowledge, okay? I don't know how to make this into a sensible question... It's all so stupid. All these interviews are always so damned useless.”

He rose from his desk and walked out the door and down the corridor, drumming his knuckles along the wall. The writer heard him shout, just before he disappeared: “It's goddamned useless to talk about these things! It's a complete waste of time! The history of these things is nonsense! You're trying to make something difficult and complicated out of something that's simple and beautiful.”

Across the hall Murray Gell-Mann looked out of his office. “I see you've met Dick,” he said."

Haha who could not love him?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K