Are We Becoming More Mathematical in Physics?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
Sign up Log in
4 replies · 2K views
rahaverhma
Messages
73
Reaction score
1
In physics are we going more mathematical?
 

Discussion

Physics news on Phys.org
The modifier "more" seems strange here. Physics has always made use of whatever mathematics could be useful, so l can't really see how we get to more.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
Mass, energy, do not have complete definition. Force also didn't had but now it is no more. Lefts are only length and time.
 
rahaverhma said:
Mass, energy, do not have complete definition. Force also didn't had but now it is no more. Lefts are only length and time.
Sorry, your post did not translate very well. Can you please post links to the reading you have been doing that makes you believe these things about Mass, Energy, Force, Length and Time? Thank you.
 
Math is the toolbox, but not the focus of study - not my quote. :smile:
 

Similar threads

Which is More Mathematical: The Princeton Companion or Mathematics for Physics?

  • Indiana
  • · Replies 1 ·
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1

Recommended Cosmology Textbooks for Mathematical and Physics Backgrounds

  • Carlos L. Janer
  • · Replies 7 ·
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
7

Are We Becoming Too Dependent on Technology?

  • Dembadon
  • · Replies 55 ·
  • Computing and Technology
2
Replies
55

Mathematica Is physics more mathematical than other sciences?

  • Loren Booda
  • · Replies 2 ·
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2

Undergrad Difference betw mathematical and physics definition of fields

  • zerok
  • · Replies 5 ·
  • General Math
Replies
5

Mathematica How do I think more mathematically?

  • STS816
  • · Replies 8 ·
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
8

Mathematica Famous one on circuits - but more mathematical

  • rushil
  • · Replies 4 ·
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
4