Are wisdom teeth important to get out?

[Lancelot59]

Think of the possibilities if you had guided those teeth into the right spot! She could've been a double vampire!

I got all four of mine taken out. Luckily they hadn't impacted yet. That was one crappy week. The erythromycin made me sensitive to sunlight while I was taking it...I almost got caught out in it while I was out returning a book and the clouds opened up.

 

[Bohrok]

Now that's evolution in action!

Like a third arm or a sixth finger?

How about getting the upper wisdom teeth but not the lower ones? Happened with my mom.

 

[Proton Soup]

My oldest daughter, Spawn of Evo is a shark. Her adult canine had come in, then to my horror, it fell out. An x-ray of her mouth revealed that she had a third full set of adult teeth coming in. She had to have surgery to cut open the roof of her mouth and extract the third set. We only let the third tooth come into replace the one that had been pushed out.

i had a guy tell me once that his wife lost an adult tooth and grew a new one. always thought maybe she had an extra up there hidden by crowding or something, but maybe not.

 

[Lancelot59]

Perhaps genetic engineering in the future will allow us to graft the gene that let's sharks re-grow their teeth into humans. That would be pretty good. Got a cavity? No problem, just pull it and let the new one grow in.

 

[Borek]

Now that's evolution in action!

Exactly, that's the evolutionary answer to kids eating lots of candies.

 

[Borek]

Perhaps genetic engineering in the future will allow us to graft the gene that let's sharks re-grow their teeth into humans. That would be pretty good. Got a cavity? No problem, just pull it and let the new one grow in.

I don't think we have to use shark genes for that, if we can restart our own tooth growing mechanism that will be enough - and we have all genes already in place.

 

[Lancelot59]

True, we might not even need to do genetic modification. Just inject the right compounds to stimulate it.

 

[Monique]

True, we might not even need to do genetic modification. Just inject the right compounds to stimulate it.

If you want to stimulate something, there first needs to be something there to receive the stimulus and it also needs to be receptive to the stimulus. On the other hand, teratomas can develop teeth, so maybe it won't be impossible to grow new teeth in the lab from reprogrammed cells http://bjr.birjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/53/625/40

 

[leroyjenkens]

It doesn't contradict it, no. What it does so is provide evidence that your otherwise-unsupported opinion may be wrong.

So after 8 people, your 50% statistic is evidence that my opinion that you'll probably have a problem with wisdom teeth is wrong?

What if you came up with your statistic after only the first two posts? You'd have 100% statistic. Since your 50% statistic may prove me wrong because that 50% may stay constant throughout the entire population, would your 100% statistic do the same?

They could also be Kings of the Outer Planets, whose teeth are made of diamond.

Which would be just as likely as someone having overcrowding from wisdom teeth.

You can't invent conditions then base your conclusions on what ifs.

You came up with the 50% statistic to refute what I said. 50% of those people still have their wisdom teeth. I never said more than 50% will have them removed, I said you'll probably have PROBLEMS with them (so let's assume probably means more than 50%). Still having your teeth doesn't equal no problems, so you're basing your conclusion on an incomplete statistic.

It is a significantly better representation than is zero - by an order of magnitude or three .

I was the first one to say that my "evidence" is quite sketchy (n=8). Nonetheless, it's stronger than a mere opinion. It should be trivial to refute my little poll with stronger numbers.

I don't remember seeing you say anything about your evidence being sketchy.
I have a greater number of people than eight that I personally know who could be a better representation. But that's not proof, so I tried to find a statistic online that fits my specifications. It's not easy.

I picture you as one of those Geico cavemen who took offense to my neanderthal comment. I admit, it's most likely the difference in teeth size that affects it more so than people having gigantic mouths.
But I still firmly believe most people will have problems with their wisdom teeth, in one form or another.

 

[DaveC426913]

So after 8 people, your 50% statistic is evidence that my opinion that you'll probably have a problem with wisdom teeth is wrong?

No. Just that it might benefit from more support.

What if you came up with your statistic after only the first two posts? You'd have 100% statistic. Since your 50% statistic may prove me wrong because that 50% may stay constant throughout the entire population, would your 100% statistic do the same?

n=2 would be really sketchy.

I don't remember seeing you say anything about your evidence being sketchy.

Well I'll be. You're right.

I wrote those words a half dozen times over several posts. I erased them before posting each time for the same reason: I assumed it was obvious that my evidence was nothing but an informal off-the-cuff poll and proportionately as valuable.

...I tried to find a statistic online that fits my specifications. It's not easy.

I picture you as one of those Geico cavemen who took offense to my neanderthal comment. I admit, it's most likely the difference in teeth size that affects it more so than people having gigantic mouths.
But I still firmly believe most people will have problems with their wisdom teeth, in one form or another.

As do I. I've been splitting hairs.