Are zero divisors in R[x] also zero divisors in R?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chuy52506
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings Zero
Click For Summary
In a commutative ring R, if a polynomial p(x) with non-zero leading coefficient an is a zero divisor in R[x], it must imply that an is a zero divisor in R. The argument presented involves multiplying p(x) by another polynomial q(x) to show that their product equals zero, but it incorrectly states that any polynomial q can be used. The correct interpretation is that there exists a specific polynomial q such that p(x)q(x) = 0. Additionally, referring to an * bm * x^(n+m) as a zero divisor in R is inaccurate, as it is a monomial in R[x]. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity and correctness in the argument to establish the relationship between zero divisors in R[x] and R.
chuy52506
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Let R be a commutative ring. If an doesn't equal 0 and
a0+a1x+a2x^2+...+anx^n is a zero divisor in R[x], prove that an is a zero divisor in R.


What I did was say if the polynomial is a zero divisor in R[x] then let that polynomial equal p(x) and any other polynomial be q(x) with coefficients b0,b1,...,bm, then p(x)*q(x)=0. And the leading coefficient and degree will be an*bm*x^(n+m) which will be a zero divisor in R. Therefore an will be a zero divisor. However I don't know what to say to show this? is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a mostly correct argument: you have the right basic idea, but a couple of points come across as nonsense or misstated. You say "let p be a zero divisor and q be any other polynomial, then pq = 0". This is false. What it means for p to be a zero divisor is that there exists a polynomial q such that pq = 0. Also, it doesn't make sense to say "a_n b_m x^{n+m} is a zero divisor in R", as this is a monomial that lives in R[x], not in R.

Other than that, your argument just needs text editing. Try correcting these points, and then one of us can show you how to clean up the wording.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
903
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K