MHB Area bounded by 3 curves: Help with Problem Solving

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the area bounded by the curves 2y = 3sqrt(x), y = 4, and 2y + 4x = 7. The user initially attempts to integrate with respect to y but encounters errors in their calculations. A detailed solution is provided, showing that integrating with respect to y and x yields the same area result of 3475/432. The importance of sketching the region and determining intersection points for accurate integration is emphasized. The final area calculation confirms the correct approach and methods used.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Area between curves problem I cannot get?

I can't get the right answer to this problem. Can someone show it to me?

It's:
Sketch the region enclosed by the curves given below. Decide whether to integrate with respect to x or y. Then find the area of the region.

The curves are

2y = 3sqrt(x)
y=4
2y + 4x = 7

I am integrating with respect to y since y=4 was given, but my webwork keeps saying my answer is wrong. Someone please help.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: lilith's question at Yahoo! Anwers regarding finding the area bounded by three curves

Hello lilith,

First let's sketch the area to be found, with the bounded area shaded in red:

View attachment 1301

Now, we may integrate with respect to either $x$ or $y$. I prefer using $y$ as we may use one integral, but we will use both methods, the second as a means of checking our result.

To integrate with respect to $y$, we need to find the lower limit of integration, which is the intersection of the slant line and the parabolic curve. As we will need to know both coordinates for both methods, we will equate them to get the $x$-coordinate:

$$2y=3\sqrt{x}=7-4x$$

Square both sides:

$$9x=49-56x+16x^2$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$16x^2-65x+49=0$$

Factor:

$$(x-1)(16x-49)=0$$

Discarding the extraneous root, we are left with:

$$x=1\,\therefore\,y=\frac{3}{2}$$

Thus, the bounded area $A$ is given by:

$$A=\int_{\frac{3}{2}}^4 \left(\frac{2y}{3} \right)^2-\frac{7-2y}{4}\,dy=\int_{\frac{3}{2}}^4 \frac{4}{9}y^2+\frac{1}{2}y-\frac{7}{4}\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$A=\left[\frac{4}{27}y^3+\frac{1}{4}y^2-\frac{7}{4}y \right]_{\frac{3}{2}}^4=\left(\frac{256}{27}+4-7 \right)-\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{9}{16}-\frac{21}{8} \right)=\frac{175}{27}+\frac{25}{16}=\frac{3475}{432}$$

Now let's integrate with respect to $x$:

$$A=\int_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1 4-\left(\frac{7}{2}-2x \right)\,dx+\int_1^{\frac{64}{9}} 4-\left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{x} \right)\,dx=\int_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1 2x+\frac{1}{2}\,dx+\int_1^{\frac{64}{9}} 4-\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{x}\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$A=\left[x^2+\frac{1}{2}x \right]_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1+\left[4x-x^{\frac{3}{2}}\right]_1^{\frac{64}{9}}=\left(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{1}{16} \right)+\left(\frac{256}{27}-3 \right)=\frac{25}{16}+\frac{175}{27}=\frac{3475}{432}$$
 

Attachments

  • lilith.jpg
    lilith.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 102
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top