MHB Area bounded by 3 curves: Help with Problem Solving

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Area between curves problem I cannot get?

I can't get the right answer to this problem. Can someone show it to me?

It's:
Sketch the region enclosed by the curves given below. Decide whether to integrate with respect to x or y. Then find the area of the region.

The curves are

2y = 3sqrt(x)
y=4
2y + 4x = 7

I am integrating with respect to y since y=4 was given, but my webwork keeps saying my answer is wrong. Someone please help.

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: lilith's question at Yahoo! Anwers regarding finding the area bounded by three curves

Hello lilith,

First let's sketch the area to be found, with the bounded area shaded in red:

View attachment 1301

Now, we may integrate with respect to either $x$ or $y$. I prefer using $y$ as we may use one integral, but we will use both methods, the second as a means of checking our result.

To integrate with respect to $y$, we need to find the lower limit of integration, which is the intersection of the slant line and the parabolic curve. As we will need to know both coordinates for both methods, we will equate them to get the $x$-coordinate:

$$2y=3\sqrt{x}=7-4x$$

Square both sides:

$$9x=49-56x+16x^2$$

Arrange in standard quadratic form:

$$16x^2-65x+49=0$$

Factor:

$$(x-1)(16x-49)=0$$

Discarding the extraneous root, we are left with:

$$x=1\,\therefore\,y=\frac{3}{2}$$

Thus, the bounded area $A$ is given by:

$$A=\int_{\frac{3}{2}}^4 \left(\frac{2y}{3} \right)^2-\frac{7-2y}{4}\,dy=\int_{\frac{3}{2}}^4 \frac{4}{9}y^2+\frac{1}{2}y-\frac{7}{4}\,dy$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$A=\left[\frac{4}{27}y^3+\frac{1}{4}y^2-\frac{7}{4}y \right]_{\frac{3}{2}}^4=\left(\frac{256}{27}+4-7 \right)-\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{9}{16}-\frac{21}{8} \right)=\frac{175}{27}+\frac{25}{16}=\frac{3475}{432}$$

Now let's integrate with respect to $x$:

$$A=\int_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1 4-\left(\frac{7}{2}-2x \right)\,dx+\int_1^{\frac{64}{9}} 4-\left(\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{x} \right)\,dx=\int_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1 2x+\frac{1}{2}\,dx+\int_1^{\frac{64}{9}} 4-\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{x}\,dx$$

Applying the FTOC, we obtain:

$$A=\left[x^2+\frac{1}{2}x \right]_{-\frac{1}{4}}^1+\left[4x-x^{\frac{3}{2}}\right]_1^{\frac{64}{9}}=\left(\frac{3}{2}+\frac{1}{16} \right)+\left(\frac{256}{27}-3 \right)=\frac{25}{16}+\frac{175}{27}=\frac{3475}{432}$$
 

Attachments

  • lilith.jpg
    lilith.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 99
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top