Aristotle's Theory of Motion: Natural & Violent

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Aristotle's theory of motion distinguishes between natural motion and violent motion. Natural motion occurs without any apparent applied force, exemplified by falling objects and the Sun's movement across the sky. In contrast, violent motion results from an external force acting on an object, such as a push or pull. Aristotle defined all non-natural motion as violent, aligning with the Greek interpretation of "violent" as overpowering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Aristotle's philosophical concepts
  • Familiarity with basic physics principles
  • Knowledge of Greek terminology related to motion
  • Awareness of historical context in scientific thought
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Aristotle's "Physics" for deeper insights into his theories
  • Research the historical impact of Aristotle's motion theory on modern physics
  • Study the differences between natural and violent motion in contemporary physics
  • Investigate the evolution of motion concepts from Aristotle to Newton
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physics students, historians of science, and anyone interested in the foundations of motion theory.

parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19
Can any budy explain the aristotle's theory of motion : natural motion and violent motion
Please do not give the wikipedia link , I already read it ,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most simply nature motion was that motion that occurred without any apparent applied force, a motion that seem to occur by itself, e.g. a falling object, the Suns motion across the sky.. It was the nature of objects to move the way they didi. Violent motion was a motion resulting from an observed force acting on an object.as a push, pull or a striking of an object by another object. ANy non natural motion was a violent motion Even today the term violent refers to a non natural event. The Greek meaning of violent was to overpower quite appropriate for a force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
783
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K