Arrow of time in copenhagen interpretation.

In summary: If the future is not open then determinism is true.. thus copenhagen interpretation must be wrong on that account. Yet it's the most popular interpretation and is indeterministic.In summary, the most popular interpretation of quantum mechanics is indeterminism, which means that it's impossible to know the future with certainty. However, this does not mean that the future is open; determinism is still true. Advocates of the Copenhagen interpretation must either abandon causality or accept indeterminism as an ontological uncertainty.
  • #1
rocket123456
67
0
Most physicists don't draw a distinction between past, present and future.. this is called the arrow of time. Physicists such as Sean caroll, Paul Davies e.t.c But if all events exist in some sense then the future is <not> open.

If the future is not open then determinism is true.. thus copenhagen interpretation must be wrong on that account. yet it's the most popular interpretation and is indeterministic.

Do the advocates of the copenhagen variation revert back to the idea of an objective time in the universe?? It makes no sense.. if it's indeterminism ontologically.. then that simply must mean that the future is open-- and thus that time really does exist.

Even if there are uncauses events-- they still have to appear(they were never uncertain to ever occur) since everything is already "finished" in universe without an objective time and thus determinism is correct after all.

Are these sloppy terminologies with "indeterminism" labels or what's going on here?--
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the future is not open then determinism is true.. thus copenhagen interpretation must be wrong on that account.
Open in which sense? As viewed from "our" point in time? Or when viewed from the future, "after" the event? Or do you plan to define some "outside" view?

You can work with a 4-dimensional spacetime with all events fixed inside, which perfectly behaves like Copenhagen. Think of a computer simulating a universe (with Copenhagen interpretation) and storing the result.
 
  • #3
Open in the sense that whatever happens in the future does<not> need to happen.. but of course in a block-universe everything has already happened.. and everything is "stored" like in a fully compromised dvd movie.

According to the copenhagen interpretation an event clearly doesn't need to happen since it's indeterminism and random... that's my main contention here... nothing is unclear if time does not exist..

So we really need a genuine time for it to be an ontological uncertainty in the copenhagen version and also abandon causality to prevent any future event from being written in stone so it really is open as to what will happen:).
"You can work with a 4-dimensional spacetime with all events fixed inside, which perfectly behaves like Copenhagen. Think of a computer simulating a universe (with Copenhagen interpretation) and storing the result."

But then it can't be indeterminism since every event we observe had to occur if all events already exist even before we encounter them(such as our own future). Nothing is uncertain to happen in a finished movie..the same would be true with a "finished" block-universe.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
"Think of a computer simulating a universe (with Copenhagen interpretation) and storing the result."

During the simulation process it's indeterministic but that would mean a passage of time... Before and after the random selection has been decided and is finished.


But of course if there was <never> a genuine passage of time as the physicists asserts.. then all events we experience has always existed and thus every future event also already exist and had to be that way.
 
  • #5
Now you've got ME confused, rocket123456! Oh, never mind, I was already confused when I came here. :-)

I think I agree with your confusion. The uncertainty principle suggests indeterminism, yes? And the quantum formalism requires that no single outcome of a condition may be determined until the collapse of the equation by observation or measurement, yes? Uncertainty means that the potentials of any condition are always greater than one, while the outcome of that condition can never be greater than one. Doesn't this in itself suggest very strongly that time exists, that every condition incorporates a necessary potential for change which is the substance of time?

I'm sorry. This stuff is all over my head, but I surely agree with you that something is amiss in the stated conclusions of QM here.

Samm
 
  • #6
samm dickens said:
Doesn't this in itself suggest very strongly that time exists, that every condition incorporates a necessary potential for change which is the substance of time?

Samm

That's the problem since almost no physicist believe in an objective time(no external clock ticking for the universe which we are experiencing as passage of time)! Hence I wondered if it's an exception with those that adhere to the copenhagen interpretation
 
  • #7
I would define indeterminism as "given full knowledge of the universe at time t, it is (in general) impossible to determine the state of the universe at time t'>t". This is satisfied with Copenhagen, even if spacetime is viewed as a 4-dimensional object - which is just a mathematical description.
 
  • #8
mfb said:
I would define indeterminism as "given full knowledge of the universe at time t, it is (in general) impossible to determine the state of the universe at time t'>t". This is satisfied with Copenhagen, even if spacetime is viewed as a 4-dimensional object - which is just a mathematical description.

Then it's not correct for Einstein to complain about a lack of determinism... it would only mean in an epistemological sense.. not ontologically...

If all future events "are out there" and thus had to happen they way they did then it's determinism. Wikipedia labelling the copenhagen interpretation as indeterminism is therefore misstaken.
 
  • #9
No, it just uses a different meaning of the word. "are out there" is not well-defined on its own. They "are out there" in the sense that I can assign a time coordinate value to them. So what?
 
  • #10
"Are out there" means that whatever you will do in an hour is already determined-had to happen... it's not unclear(only to our limited knowledge).

Now maybe this is why Lawrence Krauss said that all interpretations of quantum mechanics are indeed deterministic, and added that the measurements are indeterministic.

"Determinism is a philosophy stating that for everything that happens there are conditions such that, given them, nothing else could happen"

This definition has nothing to do with if you can calculate and acquire knowledge of uppcomming events.

So if we talk about the actual world we are living in, and place the copenhagen interpretation in a block-universe then it's deterministic by definition!
 
  • #11
Why does Michio Kaku talk about indeterminism from this theory like it actually means "it did not have to happen"



He mentions the hypotethical axe murderer and cites Einstein-- and then says he was wrong.

So that would entail that by indeterminism it is indeed referring to what I was interpreting it to be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is the arrow of time?

The arrow of time refers to the concept that time only moves in one direction, from the past to the future. This is a fundamental aspect of our perception of time and is often described as time's "flow" or "direction".

2. How is the arrow of time related to the Copenhagen interpretation?

The Copenhagen interpretation is a fundamental principle in quantum mechanics, which states that the act of observation or measurement can affect the behavior of particles. The arrow of time is also a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics, as it dictates the flow of time in which measurements and observations take place.

3. Can the arrow of time be reversed?

The arrow of time is a fundamental aspect of the universe and cannot be reversed. This is because the laws of physics, including the laws of thermodynamics, dictate that entropy (or disorder) always increases with time, making it impossible to reverse the flow of time.

4. How does the arrow of time relate to the concept of causality?

The arrow of time is closely linked to the concept of causality, which states that every event has a cause and effect relationship. The arrow of time dictates that the cause of an event must occur before the effect, as time only moves in one direction.

5. What are some current theories or explanations for the arrow of time?

One explanation for the arrow of time is the Big Bang theory, which suggests that time began with the creation of the universe and has been moving forward ever since. Another theory is the thermodynamic arrow of time, which explains the flow of time in terms of the increase of entropy in the universe. However, the exact nature of the arrow of time is still a subject of ongoing research and debate in the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
190
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
370
Views
9K
Replies
36
Views
2K
Back
Top