Arthur C Clarke's space ships -- propulsion discussion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the propulsion technologies depicted in Arthur C. Clarke's "Space Odyssey" series, specifically the ships Discovery, Galaxy, Universe, and Goliath. Key technologies mentioned include fusion rockets, which NASA has explored, and muon propulsion, which is criticized for its instability and inefficiency compared to ion engines. The conversation highlights the plausibility of these fictional technologies and their grounding in real scientific concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fusion rocket technology
  • Familiarity with ion propulsion systems
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics, particularly muons
  • Awareness of NASA's historical propulsion research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research NASA's fusion rocket prototypes and plans
  • Explore the principles of ion propulsion technology
  • Study the properties and applications of muons in physics
  • Investigate current advancements in spacecraft propulsion systems
USEFUL FOR

Science fiction enthusiasts, aerospace engineers, physicists, and anyone interested in the intersection of fiction and real-world propulsion technologies.

HyperTechno
Messages
142
Reaction score
7
I've read Sir Arthur C Clerk's space odyssey series and curious of the propulsion technologies used in those ships. Ships like Universe and Galaxy of space odyssey 2061 use just water. The fiction speaks of "muon propulsion" too. The main spacecraft s that we see in his 'space odyssey' series are, Discovery(2001),galaxy & universe (2061), and Goliath (3001). I like to have a discussion on the propulsion technologies used in these ships and see how close to reality they are...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
FYI, it's "Clark".
 
Well, actually, it's "Clarke".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
This is interesting: http://www.space.com/33537- spacecraft -of-arthur-c-clarke-stephen-baxter.html

That says that in Space Odyssey the ship was an fusion rocket, which is a perfectly reasonable technology. It was something that NASA was legitimately looking at and I think even had a prototype (at very least I know they had detailed plans.)

I don't see why muons would ever be used in propulsion. If you pushed it out an electromagnetic nozzle, it'd give you more kick than an electron, but it'd be nothing compared to the atomic nuclei that current ion engines produce. Not to mention that muons are not stable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HyperTechno
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, actually, it's "Clarke".
If I had put the E on the end you wouldn't have had something to post. :)
 
How long does it need to last. It only has to last long enough to react with the thruster and get far enough away from the ship to not mutate it's bum
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
39K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K