Did Arthur C Clarke invent Geostationary orbit of satellites ?

In summary, Arthur C Clarke is credited with coming up with the idea of putting communication satellites in a geo-stat orbit, which was an old idea that was later discovered and developed by other people. This is a common misunderstanding, as Clarke only came up with the idea of putting communication satellites in a geo-stat orbit, and it is unlikely that most of his ideas would have been patentable in the way he conceived them.
  • #1
Neil Burns
5
0
I have been told that the discovery of the Geostationary orbit of satellites was attributed to Arthur C Clarke the well known writer of Science Fiction stories. Is it possible that he also made a serious study of this subject and were there any formulas involved which he might have published? Jockndoris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Neil Burns said:
I have been told that the discovery of the Geostationary orbit of satellites was attributed to Arthur C Clarke the well known writer of Science Fiction stories. Is it possible that he also made a serious study of this subject and were there any formulas involved which he might have published? Jockndoris
There is a web page with some information: http://lakdiva.org/clarke/1945ww/

Apparently, he was the first to make that proposal, published in the now-defunct magazine 'Wireless World'.
 
  • #4
NTW said:
There is a web page with some information: http://lakdiva.org/clarke/1945ww/

Apparently, he was the first to make that proposal, published in the now-defunct magazine 'Wireless World'.
 
  • #5
Thank you very much for your reply. I have looked at the link which was most helpful
I had asked the question because in as book I have published recently called Haunted by Neil Armstrong by Neil Burns, I talked about a paper I had written at University of St Andrews in 1963. It concerned the difficulties the Americans would face in trying to get to the Moon by the end of that decade. One of the points of difficulty was getting into a stable orbit which they apparently knew nothing about.
I had said that I had read that Arthur C Clarke had invented getting into geostable orbit which was a remarkable development.
Some critics said that it was only discovered much later and of course with your link I am proved to be right. Thanks again Neil
 
  • #6
Do note that there's a difference between saying he came up with the idea of putting communication satellites in the geo-stat orbit (which he apparently did), and saying he invented the geo-stat orbit (which is probably as old as Newton), or ways of putting stuff in said orbit.
The way you framed your statements so far is ambiguous enough to possibly be construed as any of the above meanings. Perhaps the criticism you speak of was a result of simple misunderstanding, stemming from an imprecise statement about the issue?
 
  • #7
  • #8
Bandersnatch said:
Do note that there's a difference between saying he came up with the idea of putting communication satellites in the geo-stat orbit (which he apparently did), and saying he invented the geo-stat orbit (which is probably as old as Newton), or ways of putting stuff in said orbit.
The way you framed your statements so far is ambiguous enough to possibly be construed as any of the above meanings. Perhaps the criticism you speak of was a result of simple misunderstanding, stemming from an imprecise statement about the issue?
Agreed. In particular, the word "invent" has a much stricter definition than is being used here. It means to demonstrate either with a model or with math exactly how something is done, not just envisioning something (we get this on PF every few months: "I've invented..." -- no you haven't). Clarke had great vision, but he was most certainly not an inventor and it is unlikely that most of his ideas would have been patentable in the way hea conceived them. Indeed, geostationary orbits probably weren't patentable (did anyone ever try?) because they were a fairly obvious consequence of Newton's law of gravity.
 
  • #9
That is the advantage of being a science fiction writer, you can have a brilliant idea that may indeed be a possibility, like anti gravity flight, yet you don't have to provide any facts of science or the math behind such and idea to make it real in your writing. Does that mean Vern invented submarines? Since this effect is so common in fictional writing, one would not be to far out in left field, to assume that the creative process enables one to tap into the Universal Subconscious, where all ideas are hatched. Some make it into the real world through blood, sweat and hard scientific work, others just percolate up and out as ideas in creative endeavors. When technology catches up, they are often pulled into our reality as useful tools.

I work as a designer in the real world, and I can design all kinds of things that can be built but, I myself cannot build them, often many simply cannot be built within the limits of current technologies.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
  • #11
Boothby171 said:
It looks like you CAN patent orbits!

I'm not sure if I like that idea, though...

http://ipinspace.com/2012/09/12/patenting-orbits-its-all-part-of-the-process/
I think you misread or maybe the title of the article is misleading. It goes on to state:
"It is important to keep in mind however that the orbits themselves aren’t patented, technological solutions for providing telecommunications which utilize equipment in those orbits are patent eligible."

What this is saying is you can only patent technologies that utilize that orbit.

But the orbit is much like a parcel of land: under international law, "whoever gets there first" can stake their claim on it--just keep in mind, other items can "share" that same orbital path your satellite follows. And it can quickly become a very messy international incident if your satellite interferes with another's property.
 
  • #12
NTW said:
There is a web page with some information: http://lakdiva.org/clarke/1945ww/

Apparently, he was the first to make that proposal, published in the now-defunct magazine 'Wireless World'.
The article is also reprinted in his 1999 collection of essays Greetings, Carbon-based Bipeds
 
  • #13
It's true that Clarke is generally acknowledged as the originator of that idea, but space-travel pioneer Hermann Noordung had proposed it thirty years before and in much detail, in a book that is now freely available in the internet:

http://bhaak.net/buchscans/noordung.html
 
  • #14
NTW said:
It's true that Clarke is generally acknowledged as the originator of that idea, but space-travel pioneer Hermann Noordung had proposed it thirty years before and in much detail, in a book that is now freely available in the internet:

http://bhaak.net/buchscans/noordung.html

Often the person who gets the credit isn't the originator. It's the guy who pushes the idea through and deals with all the hassles of resistance who (deservedly) gets the credit.
 

1. How did Arthur C Clarke come up with the idea of geostationary orbit for satellites?

Arthur C Clarke first proposed the concept of geostationary orbit in a 1945 paper, titled "Extra-Terrestrial Relays: Can Rocket Stations Give World-wide Radio Coverage?". In this paper, he discussed the idea of placing three satellites in orbit at equal distances from each other and at an altitude of 22,300 miles above the Earth's equator. This is known as the geostationary orbit.

2. Did Arthur C Clarke invent geostationary orbit or was it already known?

While the idea of geostationary orbit was known before Clarke's paper, he was the first to propose its use for telecommunication purposes. His paper gained widespread recognition and is considered the first formal proposal of the concept.

3. How does geostationary orbit work for satellites?

Geostationary orbit allows satellites to maintain a fixed position above the Earth's surface. This is achieved by placing the satellite at an altitude where its orbital speed matches the Earth's rotation. This means that the satellite will appear stationary from the perspective of an observer on Earth.

4. What are the advantages of using geostationary orbit for satellites?

Geostationary orbit has several advantages for satellite communication, including providing continuous coverage of a specific region and requiring fewer satellites to provide global coverage. It also allows for a consistent signal strength and minimizes the need for satellite tracking and repositioning.

5. How has the use of geostationary orbit for satellites impacted communication and technology?

The use of geostationary orbit for satellites has greatly improved global communication and technology. It has enabled the development of satellite television, GPS navigation, and internet services. It has also played a crucial role in disaster management, weather forecasting, and remote sensing.

Similar threads

  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Back
Top