What's so great about A Space Odyssey ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hobold
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
"A Space Odyssey" is often praised for its groundbreaking visual effects and philosophical themes, but opinions on its narrative coherence vary widely. Critics argue that the film lacks a clear plot, with some viewers finding it dull and confusing, particularly in its depiction of space travel and the enigmatic monoliths. The film's pacing and abstract storytelling style can be challenging for modern audiences accustomed to faster narratives. Many suggest that reading Arthur C. Clarke's novel "2001: A Space Odyssey" provides essential context and clarity that the film does not convey, as it explores deeper themes of human evolution and intelligence. The sequel, "2010," is seen as less impactful, with some readers noting that later books in the series do not maintain the same depth. Overall, while the film is considered a classic for its artistic achievements, its appreciation often depends on individual taste and familiarity with the source material.
  • #61
tfr000 said:
Someone mentioned Clarke's Childhood's End. I found a copy at the town dump a few years ago. I had never read it. Wow. Same basic sort of plot only much creepier.
Other than they are both about alien contact, I don't see how the plots are the same, even basically. I agree it is creepier, though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
paisiello2 said:
Other than they are both about alien contact, I don't see how the plots are the same, even basically. I agree it is creepier, though.
Vastly superior alien life shepherding the development of the human race.
 
  • #63
Loren said:
Aas for the sequels, they explain the story in increasing detail. The last one, 3001 is not as good as its predecessors.

I could explain the whole premise of the series...encouraging the reader to stretch his/her imagination, which means you have to think. This is not Star Wars..
To be honest, I felt the whole series more "Independence Day" but without Will Smith.
Aside from the predictive power such as http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24477667 I found that it was rather extreme that the incredibly ancient masterfully advanced alien species could be defeated so readily by a
 
  • #64
tfr000 said:
Vastly superior alien life shepherding the development of the human race.
I guess I never thought about 2001 that way but it seems a reasonable interpretation.
 
  • #65
paisiello2 said:
I guess I never thought about 2001 that way but it seems a reasonable interpretation.
"Interpretation"?

It's the entire plot of 2001... There's no room for other interpretation when it's essentially spelled out that this is why the monolith's are deployed. Although I would not use the word 'shepherding', shepherds are not likely to terminate their whole flock just because they decide they no longer like the sheep...
 
  • #66
I read the book first, then saw the movie.

love the book but find the movie rather boring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
13K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K