Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Arxiv stats for 2005 are ready

  1. Jan 2, 2006 #1

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    http://arxiv.org/Stats/

    they plot the average monthly posting rate for preprints
    in several categories: hep, astro, mathphys, condensedmatter

    the solid bar is the actual posting in that category, the blank part is crossposting from other categories

    so looking at the solid blue, for hep, and the red for astro, you can see that hep used to be the leader
    and now astro and condensed and mathphys have all caught up
    and even seem to have surpassed hep.

    I think we could see the trends in the data up thru 2004 and this mostly just confirms what people thought was happening

    thanks to Alejandro (arivero) for flagging these charts a year or so ago---I am just noting that they have been updated as of today.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 2, 2006 #2

    marcus

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award
    Dearly Missed

    Gr-qc

    in case anyone is interested, here is the same chart for GR-QC----that is Gen Rel and Quantum Cosmology.

    http://arxiv.org/Stats/gr-qc_monthly.png

    It is pretty small compared with major categories like hep and astro.

    Also it is growing very slowly, compared with fastgrowing fields like condensed matter and mathphys.


    I think the monthly posting rate for hep or astro is around 800 and for GR-QC it is around 150. so less than 1/5

    but the thing is, hep and astro have a big contribution from the EXPERIMENTAL AND OBSERVATIONAL contingent. they are not just theory, they have a lot of telescope and laboratory work to report

    ============================

    this is a good time to gather some data on research trends. here are some links that might be handy

    http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/nucl-ex,...brane+abs:+OR+M-theory+p-brane/0/1/0/2006/0/1

    this is might work in a few weeks after some papers have accumulated for 2006, now it is too early.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2006
  4. Jan 2, 2006 #3

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    From the first chart, it looks like hep-th climbed and then sank, while condensed matter just kept climbing.
     
  5. Jan 3, 2006 #4

    Chronos

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2015 Award

    This makes sense to me, SA. A lot of very knotty issues hinge on condensed matter experiments. The LHC, IMO, will be the light at the end of the tunnel. Even weak sisters, like Brookhaven, have brought us tantalizingly close to the edge of the abyss. Just to go out on a limb, I think the LHC will make or break the case for dark matter.
     
  6. Jan 3, 2006 #5

    ahrkron

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    I wonder what the effect will be of the incoming data from LHC once it turns on.

    I tried to see some feature in the plots around March 95, when the top was discovered, but there is nothing too apparent. On the other hand, the ammount of data and CPU available for its analysis (via the GRID) will be several orders of magnitude larger for LHC than what has been previously seen...
     
  7. Jan 3, 2006 #6

    ahrkron

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    Also, it makes more sense to try to find a correlation with the first physics runs of the Tevatron, in 1988, but the plots do not go that far back.
     
  8. Jan 3, 2006 #7

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    It's a pity, and a disaster for physics, that the US Congress has apparently used the expectations of the LHC to slash funding for high energy particle physics in the States.
     
  9. Jan 3, 2006 #8

    arivero

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Kamiokande &c confirmations of neutrino oscillations are almost unperceptible in the graph.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Arxiv stats for 2005 are ready
  1. Arxiv trackback (Replies: 24)

  2. New Arxiv stats (Replies: 4)

Loading...