MHB Ask for constructing function from coordinate(x,y) points

  • Thread starter Thread starter bundit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Points
bundit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm new in this forum. I would like to know how to calculate to obtain the function expression of some given coordinate points(x,y). For example, if I have 6 coordinate points which are

(x,y)
(0.23, 4.5)
(0.25, 6.5)
(0.35, 8.8)
(0.43, 15)
(0.45, 17)
(0.5, 25)

The (x,y) relation are apparently not linearized. It seems to by y=a.exp(b.x). How to calculate to derive the equation of y in term of y=f(x)?

Thank you.
Bundit
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My recommendation: Excel. Plot the points up in Excel, and try fitting trendlines of various types to your data. Warning: six points isn't going to give you that much information. Do you need to interpolate or extrapolate?

The best fit I found (without going to very high-order polynomials) was
$$y=303.31x^{2}-151.14x+24.221,$$
with an $R^{2}$-value of $0.9895$. You can do a bit better with a cubic:
$$y=1357.5x^{3}-1205.6x^{2}+387.32x-36.859,$$
with an $R^{2}$ value of $0.9968$.
 
Ackbach said:
My recommendation: Excel. Plot the points up in Excel, and try fitting trendlines of various types to your data. Warning: six points isn't going to give you that much information. Do you need to interpolate or extrapolate?

The best fit I found (without going to very high-order polynomials) was
$$y=303.31x^{2}-151.14x+24.221,$$
with an $R^{2}$-value of $0.9895$. You can do a bit better with a cubic:
$$y=1357.5x^{3}-1205.6x^{2}+387.32x-36.859,$$
with an $R^{2}$ value of $0.9968$.

Thank you,Ackbach.
By the way, can you brief me the definition of R^2 in your quote.?

Thanks.
Bundit
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K