MHB [ASK] Induction Determine the value of n if 1 + 3 + 6 + .... + n(n - 1)/2 = 364

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Value
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
Determine the value of n if 1 + 3 + 6 + ... + $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) = 364

What I did:
I know that 1, 3, and 6 are the result of arithmetic series with the starting value 1 and the difference 2, thus that sum can be written as S1 + S2 + S3 + ... + Sn = 364. However, by assuming that Sn = $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) I got n + 1 = n - 1 which is simply unsolvable at all. After all, the term $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) doesn't match for n = 1. Does this question even have any solution?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would write:

$$\frac{1}{2}\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k(k-1)\right)=364$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2-k\right)=728$$

What are the formulas for:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k\right)$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
What are the formulas for:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k\right)$$
$$\frac{1}{2}n(n-1)?$$

MarkFL said:
What are the formulas for:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)$$
I don't know...
 
Monoxdifly said:
$$\frac{1}{2}n(n-1)?$$

Not quite, it is:

$$ \sum_{k=1}^n\left(k\right)=\frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$

Monoxdifly said:
I don't know...

Now for:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)$$

The sum of squared terms is going to be a cubic function, so let's write:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)=an^3+bn^2+cn+d$$

Now, consider, that we have:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)=\sum_{k=0}^n\left(k^2\right)$$

$$\sum_{k=0}^1\left(k^2\right)=0^2=0$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^1\left(k^2\right)=0+1^2=1$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^2\left(k^2\right)=1+2^2=5$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^3\left(k^2\right)=5+3^2=14$$

So, this gives rise to the system:

$$d=0$$

$$a+b+c=1$$

$$8a+4b+2c=5$$

$$27a+9b+3c=14$$

I would use Gaussian elimination to solve this system:

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 8 & 4 & 2 & 5 \\ 27 & 9 & 3 & 14 \end{array}\right]$$

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & -4 & -6 & -3 \\ 0 & -18 & -24 & -13 \end{array}\right]$$

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{3}{4} \\ 0 & -18 & -24 & -13 \end{array}\right]$$

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{4} \\ 0 & 1 & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{3}{4} \\ 0 & 0 & 3 & \frac{1}{2} \end{array}\right]$$

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{4} \\ 0 & 1 & \frac{3}{2} & \frac{3}{4} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{6} \end{array}\right]$$

$$\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}1 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{3} \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & \frac{1}{6} \end{array}\right]$$

This tells us:

$$(a,b,c,d)=\left(\frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{6},0\right)$$

Hence:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2\right)=\frac{1}{3}n^3+\frac{1}{2}n^2+\frac{1}{6}n=\frac{2n^3+3n^2+n}{6}=\frac{n\left(2n^2+3n+1\right)}{6}=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$$

Now, can you proceed with these formulas?
 
Monoxdifly said:
Determine the value of n if 1 + 3 + 6 + ... + $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) = 364

What I did:
I know that 1, 3, and 6 are the result of arithmetic series with the starting value 1 and the difference 2, thus that sum can be written as S1 + S2 + S3 + ... + Sn = 364. However, by assuming that Sn = $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) I got n + 1 = n - 1 which is simply unsolvable at all. After all, the term $$\frac{1}{2}$$n(n - 1) doesn't match for n = 1. Does this question even have any solution?
I think you maybe confusing two things here. If you say the sum can be written as $S_{1}+S_{2}+\cdots+S_{n} = 364$, then $S_n$ is the $n^{th}$ term of the sequence which, as you say, is $\frac{1}{2} n(n-1)$. This is different from the sum. The question is asking you to find $n$ if the sum $S_{1}+S_{2}+\cdots+S_{n}$ evaluates to $364$. Maybe the choice of naming the terms $S_1, S_2, \ldots, S_n$ is a cause for confusion as you might be used to denoting the value of the sum as $S_n$, in which case perhaps naming them $T_1, T_2, \ldots, T_n$ might be better.
 
Last edited:
To follow up, we have:

$$\sum_{k=1}^n\left(k^2-k\right)=728$$

Using our summation formulas, we get:

$$\frac{2n^3+3n^2+n}{6}-\frac{n^2+n}{2}=728$$

Multiply through by 6:

$$2n^3+3n^2+n-3n^2-3n=4368$$

Arrange in standard form:

$$2n^3-2n-4368=0$$

Divide through by 2:

$$n^3-n-2184=0$$

Let:

$$f(n)=n^3-n-2184$$

Trying the factors of 2184 in according with the rational roots theorem, we find:

$$f(13)=0$$

Then, using synthetic division, we obtain:

$$\begin{array}{c|rr}& 1 & 0 & -1 & -2184 \\ 13 & & 13 & 169 & 2184 \\ \hline & 1 & 13 & 168 & 0 \end{array}$$

This tells us:

$$f(n)=(n-13)\left(n^2+13n+168\right)$$

We see that the discriminant of the quadratic factor is negative, leaving only:

$$n=13$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top