MHB [ASK]Quadratic Inequation (log_2x)^2+4>5log_7x+log_3x^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
How to solve this?
$$(log_2x)^2+4>5log_7x+log_3x^2$$
This is what I've done so far (attached):

How to solve the quadratic inequation formed? Factorization is an obvious no, and the quadratic formula will just make everything messier, is there any other way?
 

Attachments

  • Takok'ke Forum.jpg
    Takok'ke Forum.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 104
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your use of a superscript-prefix for logarithm base, ^3log x, rather than a subsript, log_3(x), is a bit confusing and sometimes very misleading as what should be 2 log_3(x) is given as 2^3 log(x) where the base of the logarithm looks like an exponent on 2. In any case, if I am reading it correctly you wind up with 4(log_x(2))^2- (5 log_7(2)+ 2log_3(2)) log_x(2)+ 1> 0. I would write that 4y^2- by+ 1> 0 with y= log_3(x) and b= 5 log7(2)+ 2log3(2) which is approximately 3.04.

By the quadratic formula, y is 0 for \frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}. Since the leading coefficient of the quadratic is positive, the graph of the quadratic is a parabola opening upward. The inequality will be satisfied for y= log_x(2)= \frac{ln(x)}{ln(2)}&gt; \frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8} or y= log_x(2)= \frac{ln(x)}{ln(2)}&lt; \frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}. Since ln(2) is positive, that is the same as ln(x)&gt; <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span> so x&gt; e^{<span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}}</span></span>
and x&lt; e^{ln(2)<span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\frac{-b-\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}}</span>
. Use b= 3.04, approximately, to get a numeric answer if you need it.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Since ln(2) is positive, that is the same as ln(x)&gt; <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\frac{-b+\sqrt{b^2- 4}}{8}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
<span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> <br /> How did the ln(2) vanish just because it&#039;s positive? Also, are you sure that what&#039;s in the square roots should be $$b^2-4$$ instead of $$b^2-16$$?</span>
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top