MHB [ASK]Solution Set of a Trigonometry Inequation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monoxdifly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Trigonometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the trigonometric inequality $$2\sin^2x \geq 3\cos2x + 3$$ within the interval [0, 2π]. The correct approach leads to the critical values $$x = \frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{2\pi}{3}, \frac{4\pi}{3}, \frac{5\pi}{3}$$, resulting in the intervals $$[\frac{\pi}{3}, \frac{2\pi}{3}] \cup [\frac{4\pi}{3}, \frac{5\pi}{3}]$$. The error in the initial solution was neglecting the negative solutions when taking the square root, which led to missing intervals. The final correct intervals are $$[60°, 120°] \cup [240°, 300°]$$, indicating that the sum of the endpoints a + b + c + d is not among the original options. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering both positive and negative solutions in trigonometric equations.
Monoxdifly
MHB
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
The set of real numbers x at the interval [0, 2π ] which satisfy $$2sin^2x\geq3cos2x+3$$ takes the form [a, b] ∪ [c, d]. The result of a + b + c + d is ...
a. 4π
b. 5π
c. 6π
d. 7π
e. 8π

What I've done thus far:
$$2sin^2x\geq3cos2x+3$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(cos2x+1)$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(cos^2x-sin^2x+sin^2x+cos^2x)$$
$$2sin^2x\geq3(2cos^2x)$$
$$sin^2x\geq3cos^2x$$
$$\frac{sin^2x}{cos^2x}\geq3$$
$$tan^2x\geq3$$
$$tanx\geq\sqrt3$$
$$tanx\geq tan60°$$ or $$tanx\geq tan240°$$
Since the value of tangent become negative after 90° and 270° respectively, I assume that [a, b] ∪ [c, d] is [60°, 90°] ∪ [240°, 270°] thus a + b + c + d = 660° = $$3\frac23\pi$$, but it isn't in the options. Where did I do wrong? I'm sure I solved the inequation alright and just blundered in determining the intervals, but how should I fix them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dividing by $\cos^2{x}$ was a mistake because $\dfrac{\pi}{2}$ and $\dfrac{3\pi}{2}$ are in the solution set$2\sin^2{x} \ge 3[\cos(2x)+1]$

$2\sin^2{x} \ge 3(1-2\sin^2{x} +1)$

$8\sin^2{x} \ge 6$

$\sin^2{x} - \dfrac{3}{4} \ge 0$

$\left(\sin{x}-\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) \left(\sin{x} + \dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) \ge 0$

critical values are $x = \dfrac{\pi}{3}, \dfrac{2\pi}{3}, \dfrac{4\pi}{3}, \dfrac{5\pi}{3} $

inequality is true for $x$ in the intervals $\left[\dfrac{\pi}{3}, \dfrac{2\pi}{3} \right] \cup \left[\dfrac{4\pi}{3}, \dfrac{5\pi}{3} \right]$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Damn, I should've kept an eye on the denominator. Thanks for your guidance.
 
Monoxdifly said:
$$tan^2x\geq3$$
$$tanx\geq\sqrt3$$
$$tanx\geq tan60°$$ or $$tanx\geq tan240°$$
Since the value of tangent become negative after 90° and 270° respectively, I assume that [a, b] ∪ [c, d] is [60°, 90°] ∪ [240°, 270°] thus a + b + c + d = 660° = $$3\frac23\pi$$, but it isn't in the options. Where did I do wrong? I'm sure I solved the inequation alright and just blundered in determining the intervals, but how should I fix them?

Also consider that when you take a square root, there is usually a positive and a negative solution.
It should be:
$$\tan^2x\ge 3 \\
|\tan x|\ge \sqrt 3 \\
\tan x \ge \sqrt 3 \quad\lor\quad \tan x \le -\sqrt 3 \\
60° \le x < 90° \quad\lor\quad 90°<x\le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x < 270° \quad\lor\quad 270°<x\le 300°
$$
Since we accidentally lost the solutions where $\cos x=0$, we can deduce that it is actually:
$$60° \le x \le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x \le 300° $$
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Also consider that when you take a square root, there is usually a positive and a negative solution.
It should be:
$$\tan^2x\ge 3 \\
|\tan x|\ge \sqrt 3 \\
\tan x \ge \sqrt 3 \quad\lor\quad \tan x \le -\sqrt 3 \\
60° \le x < 90° \quad\lor\quad 90°<x\le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x < 270° \quad\lor\quad 270°<x\le 300°
$$
Since we accidentally lost the solutions where $\cos x=0$, we can deduce that it is actually:
$$60° \le x \le 120° \quad\lor\quad 240° \le x \le 300° $$
That means I'm not completely wrong, am I?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top