Associated Laguerre Polynomial

khauna
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
(quick backgroun info) : I am a physics student who has gone through pre quantum type material and a little of quantum mechanics. I am working in a lab with fortan code based on Quantum field theory.

Anyway I am working to change some pieces of this code to attempt to solve a problem by a different way. What I would like to know is:

Does anyone know if its possible to solve the Associated Laguerre Polynomials with fractional order? Normally you must use integers which we have done in our fortran coding. I need to change that but I want to know if using fractional order is possible with laguerre polynomials and will those solutions return real numbers?

Thanks for any help and let me know if I need to be more clear or provide more information,

~ Justin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect that you should be able to write the equation in a form that is either a Hypergeometric or Confluent Hypergeometric equation, then you can have fractional orders.
 
hmm i will look into this.

Thanks :)
~ Justin
 
I'd listen to Dr Transport over me, but I believe the AL polynomials are specific solutions for the more general Legendre function (when l,n are integers). You might be safer to revert back to that general solution. If your z is within a certain range, the Legendre function can be expressed by "Laplace's first integral", which doesn't deal with contour integration. If neither of those yield fruit, this is one I'm pretty positive I've seen solved numerically for arbitrary real numbers.
 
Yea I see what your getting at. I'll be sure to look into that also.

Thanks,
~ Justin
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top