Assumptions made when deriving the speed of light

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the speed of light using Maxwell's equations, specifically focusing on the assumptions of no net charge or displacement currents in the space considered. Participants explore the implications of these assumptions in the context of electromagnetic theory.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of assumptions in deriving the speed of light and question the implications of these assumptions on the validity of Maxwell's equations. Some express confusion about why these assumptions are essential for the derivation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions required for the derivation. Some participants have provided insights into the historical context and reasoning behind these assumptions, contributing to a clearer understanding of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the idealized nature of space as empty, which influences the assumptions made in the derivation. There is also mention of potential confusion regarding terminology, such as the distinction between displacement currents and conduction currents.

Parker Mays
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem I have been working with recently has been deriving the speed of light using maxwells equations, however in order to do this I must make two assumptions; there is no net charge or displacement currents in the space in which I am attemptin to derive the speed of light. If I make these assumptions I am able to find that the speed of light is equal to 1/√(εμ) or ≅ 3E8 meters per second. I do not understand why I must make these assumptions.

Homework Equations



Maxwell's Equaitons
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every physical theory must have some assumptions that pin the theory to the real world.

My feeling is that it is reasonable to say that there is no net charge or displacement currents in space, since space is considered empty (in an idealized sense) and without any charge present there can be no displacement currents.

However, in Maxwell's time, these assumptions were much harder to accept since there was an understanding that waves traveled through a medium and that the medium being physical might have these properties of charge and displacement current. Now of course we know that space is empty.

In making these assumptions (a special case to test), we discover waves whose speed matches that of light and then make the jump to light being an electromagnetic phenomena.

Here's a discussion of the derivation that explains some of the reasoning:

http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/more_stuff/Maxwell_Eq.html

While searching on this question, I ran into this presentation of Maxwell's equations that you might find interesting:

https://web.ewu.edu/groups/technology/Claudio/ee209/f09/Lectures/physics.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom
Parker Mays said:

Homework Statement



The problem I have been working with recently has been deriving the speed of light using maxwells equations, however in order to do this I must make two assumptions; there is no net charge or displacement currents in the space in which I am attemptin to derive the speed of light. If I make these assumptions I am able to find that the speed of light is equal to 1/√(εμ) or ≅ 3E8 meters per second. I do not understand why I must make these assumptions.

Homework Equations



Maxwell's Equaitons
Because if you don't make those assumptions then the Maxwell equations would not lead to the wave equation. For example, ∇⋅E would not be zero and so ∇2E would not = εμ ∂2E/∂t2, the wave equation for E.

P.S. I think you meant to say "conduction currents", not "displacement currents". Without the latter there would be no ∂E/∂t and no waves.
 
Okay this makes a lot more sense now, thank you for your explanations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K