- #26

- 96

- 0

I divided the converted mass (kg) of the "new planet" by the mass of the Earth.

Therefore the answer is: 5.9 M(lowered E)? Is that what is meant?

- Thread starter astronomystudent
- Start date

- #26

- 96

- 0

I divided the converted mass (kg) of the "new planet" by the mass of the Earth.

Therefore the answer is: 5.9 M(lowered E)? Is that what is meant?

- #27

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,751

- 142

You could have also converted the mass of the Earth into grams. That's easy. Just add 3 to your exponent.

5.97x10^24 kg =

5.97x10^27 g

#3, Does that seem like a reasonable answer? That means Phobos would go around Mars millions of times a second.

You're doing it right, but what are the units of G? And what are the units for Semi-major axis? Are they consistent? Also, watch out how you enter this into your calculator. It's a^3/(GM), not (a^3/G)*M which is how my calculator would want to do this problem if I entered it the way you typed it.

- #28

- 96

- 0

Thus after making the following changes: T = 122932.522 seconds. It wants the answer in hours so you convert T seconds ------> hours

T= 34.1479228

ANSWER = 34 Hours

Is that right?

For number 4: I am still lost. I have that one answer, but I am lost as what to do with the distances and how to apply your hint to the problem.

- #29

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

Yep.astronomystudent said:T= 34.1479228

ANSWER = 34 Hours

Is that right?

This one's pretty tricky for an intro astronomy course. Try answering these two questions:For number 4: I am still lost. I have that one answer, but I am lost as what to do with the distances and how to apply your hint to the problem.

1) How is a planet's total reflected light related to its distance from the sun?

2) How is a planet's brightness related to its total reflected light and its distance from earth?

- #30

- 96

- 0

Still, problem 4. For Jupiter, the mean distance from the Sun is 5.2028 A.U., this is already given. The distance from the Earth to the Sun is 1 A.U. Does this have anything to do with the albedo? Is that a measurement of "brightness" or does that not have anything to do with it. Magnitude? Otherwise, I have no idea. Also, I am still unclear about what I have already solved for.SpaceTiger said:1) How is a planet's total reflected light related to its distance from the sun?

2) How is a planet's brightness related to its total reflected light and its distance from earth?

I did (7.52/5.20)^2 = 2.091360947 which is 2.0 X10^9.

- #31

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

The brightness of a planet does depend on albedo, but does the albedo change when you change its distance from the sun?astronomystudent said:Still, problem 4. For Jupiter, the mean distance from the Sun is 5.2028 A.U., this is already given. The distance from the Earth to the Sun is 1 A.U. Does this have anything to do with the albedo?

2.09 is not equal to 2.0 x 10I did (7.52/5.20)^2 = 2.091360947 which is 2.0 X10^9.

- #32

- 96

- 0

I think the albedo changes with temperature and it is dependent on the "surface." I don't think it changes with distance? But, I'm not sure. Am I on the right track? I Just don't know where I am going with this?

- #33

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

If you let Jupiter settle into a new equilibrium at a larger distance from the sun, you might see a change in the albedo, but those effects will be negligible for this calculation. Only concern yourself with brightness and distance. Did you study "flux"?astronomystudent said:

I think the albedo changes with temperature and it is dependent on the "surface." I don't think it changes with distance? But, I'm not sure. Am I on the right track? I Just don't know where I am going with this?

- #34

- 96

- 0

- #35

- 96

- 0

No, we have not studided "flux"

- #36

- 96

- 0

- #37

- 96

- 0

It is the brightness I am trying to solve for right?

- #38

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

Yes. I'm a little concerned about your approach to all this. What are you using for a text? Have you read it?astronomystudent said:It is the brightness I am trying to solve for right?

- #39

- 96

- 0

- #40

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

No, you need to use the inverse square law. Do your notes or textbook cover this anywhere? What is the name of the text?astronomystudent said:

- #41

- 96

- 0

Textbook: Astronomy Today

Chaisson - McMillan

Chaisson - McMillan

- #42

- 96

- 0

I can find the ratio if I apply the 1.0 A.U. distance from the Earth ---- Sun

If I do the following: (7.52 A.U./1.0 A.U.)^2 = 56.5504

Could this then be how much brighter it would appear from Earth if it was at a farther distance? Or am I totally off? I really am trying, I feel like you think I'm not.

- #43

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

Read (or reread) section 10.4 and see if you can answer the question:astronomystudent said:Textbook: Astronomy Today

Chaisson - McMillan

How does the sun's apparent brightness change if you double the earth's distance from the sun?

- #44

- 96

- 0

- #45

- 96

- 0

- #46

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

No, I do think you're trying...the fourth problem is very difficult at this level. I think you should consider stepping back, though, cause you'll need a more complete understanding of what an inverse square law is before you can do this problem. Try starting with the question in my previous post.astronomystudent said:I really am trying, I feel like you think I'm not.

- #47

- 96

- 0

I just left you a note about that.

- #48

SpaceTiger

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 2,940

- 2

Please try to treat this more like a message board, not a chat room. It's awkward to do this when you're posting new things every other minute. If you have several things to say, put them all in one post. Here is a link to an explanation of the 1/r^2 law that I wrote a while back:astronomystudent said:I just left you a note about that.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=70634"

Read it and see if you can answer the question in my last post.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #49

tony873004

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 1,751

- 142

Flux is the amount of something (in this case, energy) that is transmitted or received by an area of surface. I like to think of it as departing and arriving flux, just like the airport terminals.

Imagine you have a light bulb that is spherical, and 10 cm in diameter. It is 100 W (Watts, also called Joules / S). How many Watts does each square centimeter of this light bulb emit?

What's the surface area of a sphere? 4 pi * r^2. You'll find the formula for surface area of a sphere poping up in lots of flux-related problems.

So the 10 cm diameter light bulb has a surface area of:

(Diameter is divided by 2 since the forumula wants radius.)

surface area = 4 * pi * r^2

surface area = 4 * pi * (10cm/2)^2 = 314.16 cm^2

Since the light bulb emits 100 W, each square cm emits 100W / 314.16 cm^2 = 0.318 W/cm^2. This is the departure flux from the lightbulb.

Now imagine the light bulb is in a spherical room 10 meters in diameter. How much energy does each square inch of this sphere receive from the light bulb?

What is the surface area of this sphere?

surface area = 4 * pi * r^2

surface area = 4 * pi * ( (10m/2) * (100cm/m) )^2 = 3141592.7 cm^2

So each square centimeter of this room-sized sphere would receive 100W / 3141592.7 cm^2 = 3.18*10^-5 W/cm^2. This is the arriving flux.

When you want to compute something such as how much flux of sunlight does the Earth receive, you just treat the Earth as a point on the surface of a sphere whose radius is 1 AU.

Notice a similarity in the answers? The departing flux, from d=10 sphere is 0.318. The arriving flux from d=1000m is 3.18*10^-5 W/cm^3.

d2 is 100 times more than d1.

f2 is (1/100^2) that of flux 1. (inverse square law)

This is why you only need inverse square law to solve for #4. You'll need flux later, but knowing it now will help you wrap your mind around this problem a little better.

- #50

- 96

- 0

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 33

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K