At what range does a conservative force contribute to the thermal U?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the contribution of gravitational forces to the thermal and mechanical energy of a system composed of deformable bodies. The participants agree that gravitational potential energy (PE) contributes to mechanical energy, while intermolecular forces contribute to internal energy. They emphasize that there is no definitive distance at which a conservative force becomes negligible; rather, the effect diminishes with distance, typically following an inverse square law (1/r²). Ultimately, the determination of when to consider a force as negligible is subjective and context-dependent.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PE)
  • Familiarity with the concepts of mechanical and internal energy
  • Knowledge of the inverse square law (1/r²) in physics
  • Basic principles of deformable bodies in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of gravitational potential energy in thermodynamics
  • Research the role of intermolecular forces in internal energy calculations
  • Study the mechanics of deformable bodies and their energy contributions
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of forces and energy in multi-body systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mechanical engineers, and students studying thermodynamics and mechanics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the interactions of deformable bodies and energy contributions in complex systems.

etotheipi
Suppose we define our system to contain a few deformable bodies that exert gravitational forces on each other, and are consequently moving towards each other in some vague sense.

We might want to express the total energy of the system as the sum of the mechanical energy and internal energy. From my perspective, the gravitational potential energies would contribute to the mechanical part, and the intermolecular electric/gravitational/etc potential energies within the bodies themselves would contribute to the internal energy. Just because from this perspective, the macroscopic/microscopic distinction is more obvious.

However, we could have just as easily zoomed way way out of the above scenario, and considered all of those deformable bodies to make up one larger deformable body, with a fixed COM (no external forces). Now, we can just as easily say the system has no mechanical energy, and only internal energy.

So how do we draw the line? I'm aware that I'm probably misinterpreting a few things so please do let me know if this is completely the wrong outlook. Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
There is NO such line. The affect of force gets smaller with distance (typically as 1/r^2) but there is no point where it is 0. You will have to decide when you want to declare that the force is "negligible" yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
HallsofIvy said:
There is NO such line. The affect of force gets smaller with distance (typically as 1/r^2) but there is no point where it is 0. You will have to decide when you want to declare that the force is "negligible" yourself.

You're right, suppose instead we paused time and considered a snapshot of the scenario. The magnitudes of the gravitational forces between each deformable body would then be fixed.

It seems the gravitational PE between the various deformable bodies could be considered as a contribution to the thermal energy or the mechanical energy of that system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K