Athelete jump dimensional motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter madah12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the vertical motion of an athlete during a jump, specifically focusing on the time ratios related to the maximum height achieved. Participants are tasked with calculating the ratio of the time spent above half the maximum height to the time taken to reach that height from the ground, while ignoring air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the times taken to reach and stay above half the maximum height. There are attempts to derive equations relating these times, with some questioning the correctness of their approaches and calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to manipulate equations to find the desired ratio. Some participants have identified potential errors in their calculations and are exploring the implications of these errors on the final ratio. There is an acknowledgment of mixed interpretations regarding the time ratio being calculated.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that air resistance can be ignored, and there is some confusion regarding the correct interpretation of the time ratio to be calculated, leading to discussions about switching variables.

madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In the vertical jump, an athlete starts from a crouch and
jumps upward to reach as high as possible. Even the best athletes
spend little more than 1.00 s in the air (their "hang time"). Treat
the athlete as a particle and let Y(max) be his maximum height above
the floor. To explain why be seems to bang in the air, calculate the
ratio of the time be is above Y(max/2) to the time it takes him to go
from the floor to that height. You may ignore air resistance.


Homework Equations


v=v0-gt
delta y = v0t- 1/2 gt^2

The Attempt at a Solution


so I understood it as it need the ratio of t2 to t1 as t2 the time he need to get from y max/2 to y max and t1 the time from the ground to y max/2
since the displacements are cut two half they are equal so
y1=v1t1-1/2 gt1^2
=y2= v2t2- 1/2 gt2^2
where v1 is initial velocity and v2 is velocity at y max/2
v2=v1-gt1
at y max
0=v2-gt2
v2=gt2
v1=g(t1+t2)
then back to the original equation I can express it with only t1 and t2 as variables
g(t1+t2)t1-1/2 gt1^2=gt2^2 - 1/2 g t2^2

1/2 t1^2-t1t2=1/2 t22
I don't know how to work this maybe use to get the ratio should I use the quadratic equation for one of them as a variable?
but I think this is wrong I am sure I took a wrong approach and misunderstood the question I just can't see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
madah12 said:
1/2 t1^2-t1t2=1/2 t22
I don't know how to work this maybe use to get the ratio should I use the quadratic equation for one of them as a variable?
but I think this is wrong I am sure I took a wrong approach and misunderstood the question I just can't see it.

It is a nice work up to here. Divide the equation by t2^2, you will get a quadratic equation for the ratio r=t1/t2.

ehild
 
I got r= 1 + sqrt(2) is that correct?
 
I just noticed that you have a sign error in the last equation. The previous one is correct yet, you just mistyped the sign of t1t2. It should be

1/2 t1^2+t1t2=1/2 t2^2,

that means r=-1+sqrt(2). It takes a shorter time to reach half of maximum height from ground than the maximum from half-height.

ehild
 
uhm did i switch the times in the original question? was I supposed to get t2/t1 instead of t1/t2?
ratio of the time be is above Y(max/2) to the time it takes him to go
from the floor to that height.
but all I need to do is invert it right so 1/(-1+sqrt(2))=1 + sqrt(2)?
 
Well, yes, I mixed the rtimes... The question was t2/t1, so your result was correct:smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K