High School Atoms, Black Holes: Solving 2 Problems with 1 Theory?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between atomic behavior and black holes, questioning whether black holes could be analogous to atoms. However, it is clarified that the laws of physics do not break down at the atomic level, and atoms cannot exceed a certain number of protons without becoming unstable. The conditions within black holes are described as extreme, creating states of matter that differ significantly from atomic nuclei. The conversation emphasizes the lack of understanding regarding both infinitely small and infinitely massive entities, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the proposed connection is unfounded. The thread was subsequently locked due to the speculative nature of the discussion.
tony169
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Are black holes atoms?
The laws of physics breaks down at an atomic level, it also breaks down around black holes.

could the two be related? could a black hole be an atom with a periodic number in the (insert ridiculous number here) ?

If it were true that black holes where atoms / elements it'd turn two problems into one.
 
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy
Astronomy news on Phys.org
tony169 said:
The laws of physics breaks down at an atomic level

No they don't. The known laws of physics don't break down until well below the scale of atoms. Atomic-scale interactions and behavior are extremely well known and our theories make extremely accurate predictions at that scale.

tony169 said:
could the two be related? could a black hole be an atom with a periodic number in the (insert ridiculous number here) ?

No, absolutely not. Atoms can't have more than a certain number of protons in their nuclei without becoming unstable due to the repulsion of said protons. So once you reach lead, anything after it is unstable, and the general trend is a decreasing stability as atomic number increases. That's why the elements with the largest known atomic numbers are so hard to synthesize and study. They all decay in fractions of a second!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and russ_watters
With respect, we really have no clue about the infinitely small and the infinitely massive, math does not work here.

But if matter in a black hole is compacted into infinite density, would that not be an atomic core?
 
  • Skeptical
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy and davenn
tony169 said:
With respect, we really have no clue about the infinitely small and the infinitely massive, math does not work here.

We are talking about neither infinitely small things nor infinitely massive things. Atoms and subatomic particles have non-zero interaction ranges (I say that instead of 'size' because size is a complicated issue when it comes to fundamental particles) while black holes do not have infinite mass.

tony169 said:
But if matter in a black hole is compacted into infinite density, would that not be an atomic core?

No, not at all. The nucleus of an atom is comprised of protons and neutrons in a bound state, which are themselves composed of quarks and gluons. Just looking at a neutron star we run into a situation where we find a 'sea' of free neutrons and protons in the middle regions of the star and quite possibly a quark-gluon plasma in the middle of the core. Neither of these match the conditions of an atomic nucleus.

The conditions inside a black hole are even more extreme, and are likely to create states of matter that we've never seen before and that are nothing like atomic nuclei.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970, BillTre and russ_watters
tony169 said:
With respect, we really have no clue about the infinitely small and the infinitely massive, math does not work here.

But if matter in a black hole is compacted into infinite density, would that not be an atomic core?
No, and no.

You're speculating wildly and apparently not interested in learning what is actually known, where it differs from your speculations. No point in continuing. Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, phinds and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K