Black holes in the globular cluster M22 with Dr. Tom Maccarone

In summary, Dr. Tom Maccarone, coauthor of the paper "Two stellar-mass black holes in the globular cluster M22," discussed his work in an exclusive interview with Physics Forums. He explained that while it is possible for black holes to be ejected from globular clusters, they are difficult to distinguish from those formed in the Milky Way halo. He also estimated that most or all globular clusters have some black holes, with a wide range in numbers, and that the presence of metals can affect the formation of black holes. Additionally, he addressed the ongoing debate about the existence of intermediate mass black holes in globular clusters and the evidence both for and against their presence. He encourages physicists to continue their research in the hopes of
  • #1
liometopum
127
24
Dr. Tom Maccarone is a coauthor of the paper, “Two stellar-mass black holes in the globular cluster M22”, and is Associate Professor,Department of Physics, at Texas Tech University at Lubbock Texas. The work is discussed in a popular form at "Physicists Find Black Holes In Globular Star Clusters, Upsetting 40 Years Of Theory" and it appeared in the journal http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v490/n7418/full/nature11490.html.

To help us at Physics Forums better understand this significant discovery, I asked Dr. Maccarone several questions about the black holes within globular clusters. Dr. Maccarone responded. The answers are informal, given without supporting citations, and includes the work of other scientists. They should guide us to a deeper understanding of globular clusters and black holes. Here is the exclusive interview for Physics Forums:

Question1: If black holes are created, and then ejected from globular clusters, shouldn't there be renegade black holes flying around, possibly many thousands of them?

Answer1: Yes -- but they would be hard to distinguish from black holes that just formed outright in the Milky Way halo, and would be a small fraction of the total number.In principle, we can find some fraction of these black holes through microlensing experiments, but it's not easy, and people are usually focused on other things with microlensing surveys. With the LSST, we should get a better handle on the number of stellar mass black holes that are in different parts of the Milky Way. Other than microlensing searches, black holes can normally be
found only if they are in binaries. Question2: How common might black holes in globular clusters actually be? That is, what percentage of GCs have black holes?

Answer2: My guess is that most or maybe all GCs have some black holes, but maybe typically 10 or so in a cluster, with a wide range on the number, and a much smaller fraction of them in close binaries where they will accrete mass from their companion star and be detectable in photometry. Question3: Are the black holes within globular clusters a result of normal star evolution, or are they, in some way, connected to the evolution of the GC?

Answer3: It is uncertain whether the black holes in a cluster are entirely the result of normal stellar evolution. It's possible that compact objects can merge in star clusters. This can happen in close binary stars in field star populations as well, but probably for a lower fraction of the compact objects. It may, then, be that in some cases, merging two neutron stars makes a small black hole, or merging two black holes makes a heavier black hole, and that this may be more common in globular clusters, but how common this is is a fairly open question. Question4: Are there more black holes per capita within a GC than in the Milky Way? Or to ask it differently, does the old age of GC stars give us a different probability of finding black holes in GCs?

Answer4: There are probably fewer black holes per capita in a GC than in the Milky Way. Age is relatively unimportant, because black holes normally should form only from very massive stars that evolve very
quickly. We're reasonably confident that some dynamical ejection happens, which would reduce the number of black holes in globular clusters. The one thing that might work against the effects of the ejection is that globular clusters are often poor in metals, and the metals are important for the driving of stellar winds. With weaker
stellar winds, stars will be more massive at the ends of their lifetimes, which may lead to more, heavier black holes forming. My expectation is that the dynamical ejection effect is more important, but the observational data right now are not good enough to give us strong tests. Question5: Is it possible that most globular clusters harbor black holes of significant mass? (this is in response to post #50 by Chronos)

Answer5: I think post 50 was probably referring to the claims that there are intermediate mass black holes in a lot of globular clusters. The idea is that the mergers of black holes, or growth by accreting from other stars, or some other process, leads to the production of black holes of a few thousand to a few tens of thousand
solar masses. These are more massive than can be made from normal stellar evolution, but much smaller than the supermassive black holes in the centers of galaxies.

The evidence about these is mixed. The evidence in favor comes from dynamical studies, looking at the velocity distribution of stars around the centers of the clusters. In many clusters, there is evidence which is of marginal statistical significance that says that the mass-to-light ratio of the cluster increases toward the center.

There are two major counterarguments. One is that the white dwarfs, neutron stars and stellar mass black holes should have very high mass-to-light ratios, and should sink to the centers of clusters because they are the heaviest objects in the clusters. The other is that there should be some gas in the star clusters, and the black holes should accrete some of the gas and emit X-rays and radio emission, but this has never been seen.

I think it's widely, and maybe even generally, agreed by both camps that not *all* clusters should have intermediate mass black holes, because dynamical interactions between the black holes and the other
stars would hold up core collapse.
I would like to thank Dr. Tom Maccarone for his time and the kindness extended to Physics Forums, and to Greg Bernhardt for his approval to post.

We encourage Physics Forum members to sound in with their thoughts and questions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes wabbit, Jimster41, PWiz and 2 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #3
A sincere request to all interested physicists out there - please keep looking and find a theory which completely explains quantum gravitational effects and resolves singularities, because I'm positive a breakthrough will come from your sustained efforts. I don't want to die without knowing the mystery of what happens beyond the event horizon!
 
  • Like
Likes AshUchiha and Jimster41
  • #4
PWiz said:
A sincere request to all interested physicists out there - please keep looking and find a theory which completely explains quantum gravitational effects and resolves singularities, because I'm positive a breakthrough will come from your sustained efforts. I don't want to die without knowing the mystery of what happens beyond the event horizon!
Just fly a rocket into a BH, and you will know before you die (if you can find a quiet, old one).
 
  • #5
But still its a theoretical object with no experimental evidence.
 
  • #6
PAllen said:
Just fly a rocket into a BH, and you will know before you die (if you can find a quiet, old one).

I guess I would do that
 
  • #7
Phy_enthusiast said:
But still its a theoretical object with no experimental evidence.
That's not true. There is very strong evidence for objects that would be BHs if anything close to GR is true, having all observable properties predicted for BH's. The only thing not excluded is a theory predicts objects that behave the same, externally, as GR BHs, but are not. Throughout scientific history, this has been taken as confirmation, especially as alternative theories are not yet formulated in satisfactory form (e.g. string theory, loop QG).
 
  • #8
I don't know how people make such ideas.Personally i feel there should be certain kind of ban on ideas that takes physics to metaphysics.Black hole is one of them.
 
  • #9
Phy_enthusiast said:
I don't know how people make such ideas.Personally i feel there should be certain kind of ban on ideas that takes physics to metaphysics.Black hole is one of them.
Quarks are considered accepted physics, but cannot be detected directly. Their existence and mass are inferred from the behavior of other particles that can be detected. Yet this is (now) non-controversial, due to the success of QCD as a predictive theory. The situation for BH and GR is almost identical. GR demands they exist under a broad range of conditions, effects on what is observable consistent with their existence have been made, and GR is a broadly successful predictive theory. Your position is the one inconsistent with scientific history, presumably because you don't like the idea of BHs (as some physicists initially didn't like the idea of quarks, with fractional charges and properties preventing direct detection).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Phy_enthusiast said:
I don't know how people make such ideas.Personally i feel there should be certain kind of ban on ideas that takes physics to metaphysics.Black hole is one of them.
If you don't want to believe in black holes, how would you explain the orbits of the stars right at the center of the Milky Way?
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz and liometopum
  • #11
In physics, it is standard practice to eliminate the impossible and improbable to find the truth. The GR properties of black holes are one such example.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz
  • #12
Chronos said:
In physics, it is standard practice to eliminate the impossible and improbable to find the truth. The GR properties of black holes are one such example.
Can you clarify what you mean? The main proposed alternative interiors for a BH to GR's singularity make no detectably different predictions from outside, and we would still call these objects BH (or most people would), because their exterior properties, apparent horizon size (even if really a firewall) are all as predicted by GR (presumably). They would still be a successful prediction of GR as regards possible end stated of large stars.
 
  • #13
Despite the recent frenzy in the popular press questioning the existence of black holes, it does not alter the evidence of what black holes cannot be. Some discussion here https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/seuforum/bh_reallyexist.htm. While the nature of putative spacetime singularities remains an open question, black holes, in any case, still conform to their GR predicted properties by any reasonable standard.
 

Related to Black holes in the globular cluster M22 with Dr. Tom Maccarone

1. What are black holes in a globular cluster?

Black holes in a globular cluster are incredibly dense objects formed from the gravitational collapse of massive stars. They have such strong gravitational pull that even light cannot escape from them, making them invisible to the naked eye.

2. How are black holes in M22 different from other black holes?

Black holes in the globular cluster M22 are unique because they are located inside a dense cluster of stars, rather than in isolation. This means they are in a more crowded environment, which can affect their growth and behavior.

3. How do scientists detect black holes in M22?

Scientists can detect black holes in M22 through various methods, including studying the movement of stars around the black hole and observing the X-ray emissions from the hot gas that falls into the black hole's gravitational well.

4. What is Dr. Tom Maccarone's research on black holes in M22?

Dr. Tom Maccarone is a leading expert in the study of black holes in globular clusters, including M22. He and his team use data from telescopes and computer simulations to understand the formation, evolution, and behavior of black holes in these unique environments.

5. What can we learn from studying black holes in M22?

Studying black holes in M22 can provide insights into the formation and growth of black holes in dense environments, as well as the dynamics of globular clusters. This research can also help us better understand the role of black holes in the universe and their impact on surrounding stars and galaxies.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
926
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top