Atoms in a Solid: Separate but Connected

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bodhi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Solid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the proximity of atoms in solids, exploring whether atoms can be considered isolated bodies and the nature of the space between them. Participants delve into theoretical and mathematical considerations regarding atomic spacing, bonding types, and the implications of these factors in different materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how close atoms are in solids and whether they are in contact or separated by infinitesimal distances.
  • One participant challenges the notion of atoms as solid spheres, suggesting that electronic clouds interact in complex ways rather than existing in a vacuum between atoms.
  • Another participant provides calculations for atomic spacing in various elements, including copper, lithium, beryllium, carbon, silicon, and gold, using density and atomic weight to derive approximate distances.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the original question may not solely concern interatomic distance but also what exists between atoms, providing a more detailed calculation for copper's atomic structure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of atomic interactions and the concept of space between atoms. There is no consensus on whether atoms can be considered isolated or the implications of their spacing.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on specific assumptions regarding atomic arrangement and bonding types, which may not apply universally across all solids.

bodhi
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
how close are the atoms in any solid, is all the space possible in a solid is filled up by its atom finally can we consider an atom an isolated body ,or can size of strings pass between inter atomic spaces.i believe atoms in the solid is not actually in contact but there exists infinitsimally small distance in them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bodhi said:
how close are the atoms in any solid, is all the space possible in a solid is filled up by its atom finally can we consider an atom an isolated body ,or can size of strings pass between inter atomic spaces.i believe atoms in the solid is not actually in contact but there exists infinitsimally small distance in them.
There you carry with you a lot of clandestine postulates.
Let's try to disclose them.
You postulate that atoms are kind of solid spheres, balls, maybe with strings between them.
You think that between these solid balls, there is vacuum in-between.
Nothing such exists.
Each of the electronic cloud forming any isolated atom (in vapor) is fuzzy.
In a molecule or a crystal, these fuzzy electronic clouds interact.
In a covalent solid such as diamond carbon or boron, the bonds are sharing of pairs of electrons, with antiparallel spins, with strong spatial orientations. Diamond carbon and boron are stiff to shear stress.
In the quartz, the bond between Oxygen and Silicon is partly covalent, partly ionic, so the bulk of the volume is Oxygen, with small cations.

In metals, the bond is the metallic one, where the valence electrons form a pool, very mobile, where each one is several tens of interatomic distances long and wide, running at the Fermi speed, and bouncing from phonon to phonon, or other crystalline defects.

At 0 K, in a perfect crystal, each conduction electron should be as wide as the crystal itself.

In metals, the metallic bond is not spatially oriented, that makes dislocations so easy to produce and move, and makes the metals so plastic.
 
Last edited:
bodhi said:
how close are the atoms in any solid, is all the space possible in a solid is filled up by its atom finally can we consider an atom an isolated body ,or can size of strings pass between inter atomic spaces.i believe atoms in the solid is not actually in contact but there exists infinitsimally small distance in them.

One way to do this calculation is based on the density of the solid and the mass of each individual atom in the solid.

Consider copper: Density=8.94 g/cm^3, AtomicWeight=63
using a formula ((density/0.00166)^-1/3*1000)/atomicweight you get a spacing of 227 picometers between each atom. Certainly a "large" space considering what is thought to be a maximum "size" of an individual atom. This formula assumes the atoms are arranged in squares or a n-n-n shape. Most solids do not have an exact square shape (hexagonal or face centered cubic for example), but the "average spacing" will work out to be "about" the same.

Consider a few other elements:
Lithium, AW=7, density=0.534 =>> 279 picometer spacing
Beryllium, AW=9, density=1.85 =>> 201 picometer spacing
Carbon, AW=12, density=3.5 =>> 179 picometer spacing
Silicon, AW=28, density=2.33 =>> 271 picometer spacing
Gold, AW=197, density=19.3 =>> 257 picometer spacing
 
edguy99 said:
One way to do this calculation is based on the density of the solid and the mass of each individual atom in the solid.

Consider copper: Density=8.94 g/cm^3, AtomicWeight=63
using a formula ((density/0.00166)^-1/3*1000)/atomicweight you get a spacing of 227 picometers between each atom. Certainly a "large" space considering what is thought to be a maximum "size" of an individual atom. This formula assumes the atoms are arranged in squares or a n-n-n shape. Most solids do not have an exact square shape (hexagonal or face centered cubic for example), but the "average spacing" will work out to be "about" the same.

Consider a few other elements:
Lithium, AW=7, density=0.534 =>> 279 picometer spacing
Beryllium, AW=9, density=1.85 =>> 201 picometer spacing
Carbon, AW=12, density=3.5 =>> 179 picometer spacing
Silicon, AW=28, density=2.33 =>> 271 picometer spacing
Gold, AW=197, density=19.3 =>> 257 picometer spacing

It seems that the original question was not the interatomic distance, but what can be between atom-balls.
For the copper (face-centered cubic), let's do the exact calculation :
8940 kg/m^3 means 8940 x 6.022 E26 /63.55 atoms/m^3 =8,47 E28 atoms /m^3 = 2.12 E28 cell/m^3.
Each cell volume is 47.2 E-30 m^3.
So its edge : a = 0,361 nm,
And the shortest interatomic distance, is the length of the [0, 1/2, 01/2] vector, that is a/[itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] = 0,256 nm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K