Is nitric oxide good or bad for the body?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nitric oxide (NO) serves as a crucial biological signaling molecule with both beneficial and detrimental effects on the body. While it can inhibit ATP production by affecting enzymes in the electron transport chain, it is also recognized for its role as a potent vasodilator, enhancing blood circulation and longevity. The discussion highlights the complexity of NO's effects, emphasizing that its impact is dose-dependent and context-specific, making it inappropriate to label it strictly as good or bad.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cellular respiration and ATP production
  • Familiarity with the electron transport chain
  • Knowledge of nitric oxide (NO) as a biological signaling molecule
  • Awareness of the differences between nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the biological functions of nitric oxide in detail
  • Explore the role of nitric oxide in cardiovascular health and treatment
  • Investigate the dose-dependent effects of nitric oxide on human physiology
  • Study the implications of nitric oxide in medical and dental procedures
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for medical professionals, researchers in biochemistry, and anyone interested in the physiological roles of nitric oxide in health and disease.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello,

I am learning about cellular respiration, and ATP. I was reading how nitric oxide (NO) can inhibit an important enzyme that is part of the electron transport chain and lead to less ATP production. That seems to give a bad rap to NO. But I also read how good NO is for longevity and blood circulation...

Does anyone have some clarifications to offer on this topic? Is NO good or bad? It seems bad if it affects ATP production. I am confused.

Thank you!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It would help to give you a better answer if you let us know where you got the information you cited.

1. I can say is that there have been studies (random controlled trials) on several different aspects of Nitrous Oxide use in medical and dental procedures.
Try this google search: random controlled trial on nitrous oxide
There is one trial now on for treatment of cardiovascular disease which has really positive results.

2. There is no perfect good or bad answer to a lot of medical questions. Why? Because circumstances surrounding a proposed treatment make some options completely unacceptable, like patient allergies/reactions to medications and anesthetics. I think that is what you are seeing.

3. Unless the study is of very high quality (usually an RCT (Random Controlled Trial)) you really cannot derive anything more than a good maybe about the conclusions. Sometimes the lower quality study is all we have. That can leave the reader in exactly the quandary you seem to have.
 
Last edited:
jim mcnamara said:
I can say is that there have been studies (random controlled trials) on several different aspects of Nitrous Oxide use in medical and dental procedures.

You seem to be confusing nitric oxide (NO), an important biological signaling molecule, with nitrous oxide (N2O), an anesthetic.
 
Yes, I did mix things. Thank you. I did not get what what NO was supposed to be obviously.
 
fog37 said:
Does anyone have some clarifications to offer on this topic? Is NO good or bad? It seems bad if it affects ATP production. I am confused.

As with most things in a complex living system its about balance and WHERE in the body they appear.. And as with most drugs, they are good in some cases in the right dose, while they can be toxic during other conditions. So one can say that NO is categoritcally good or bad, this is the wrong question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_functions_of_nitric_oxide

NO is a known potent vasodilator, and exist both naturally in the body (autoregulation from mechanoreceptors produce NO locally), and its also released from nitroglycerin which is a potent vasodilator drug typically used with ischemia. So nitroglycerin may be "good" if you have an ischemic attack, but not otherwise!

There also seems to be toxic effects, but they are dose dependent.
The Toxicology of Inhaled Nitric Oxide
https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/article/59/1/5/1658774

/Fredrik
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K