Attempted Part I & II Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter theredbarronmvr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving projectile motion, specifically addressing two parts of the problem. Participants are exploring the implications of air resistance on the solution and the evaluation of an integral related to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to reconcile the results from part i with the conditions of part ii, particularly questioning how the absence of air resistance affects the outcome. There is also a discussion about the validity of assumptions made during the integration process.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the nature of the problem, suggesting that it simplifies to a standard projectile motion scenario without air resistance. There is an acknowledgment of potential overthinking and clarification on the integration assumptions, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of not including air resistance in their calculations and the assumptions made during the evaluation of integrals, which may affect their understanding of the problem.

theredbarronmvr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A bullet of mass m is shot vertically up with initial speed v0. It is subject to air resistance that is quadratic in speed (constant of proportionality c2).

i. What is the maximum height reached?

ii. What initial speed u0, would be necessary to reach the same maximum height in the absence of air resistance?

Express your answers in terms of c2, g, m, and v0.
Relevant Equations
For part i: m(dv/dt) = -c2(v^2) - mg
I have an attempted solution to part i here. I'm primarily having trouble with part ii since I don't see how the x found in part i can be attained if there's no air resistance term.
 

Attachments

  • pf2.jpg
    pf2.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 133
Physics news on Phys.org
theredbarronmvr said:
I'm primarily having trouble with part ii since I don't see how the x found in part i can be attained if there's no air resistance term.
If there is no air resistance, then it's a simple projectile motion problem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theredbarronmvr
PeroK said:
If there is no air resistance, then it's a simple projectile motion problem.
Ahh of course, thank you! I was definitely overthinking it.
 
theredbarronmvr said:
I have an attempted solution to part i here. I'm primarily having trouble with part ii since I don't see how the x found in part i can be attained if there's no air resistance term.
In case you're wondering, when you evaluated the integral, you assumed ##c_2 \ne 0##, so it isn't valid to set ##c_2=0## in the expression you derived. (I assume that's the difficulty you were running into.) You have to set ##c_2## to 0 before you integrate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: theredbarronmvr

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
739
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
630
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K