I'm stuck with an elementary thing, it must be something obvious but I can't see what's wrong.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Here it goes. I was writing up some elementary course material for an instrumentation course, and wanted to quickly introduce "white noise".

Now, the usual definition of white noise is something like a stationary random process such that E( X(t) ) = 0 for all t and a flat power spectral density.

On the other hand, the autocorrelation function is defined as R(tau) = E (X(t) X(t+tau) ) (independent of t).

But here's the problem. The Wiener-Khinchine theorem states that the power spectral density equals the fourier transform of the autocorrelation function, so a flat power spectral density comes down to a Dirac for the autocorrelation. And for example on Wiki, you find that as a defining property of white noise.

But the autocorrelation of white noise E (X(t) X(t) ) is nothing else but sigma-squared.

So it would seem that the autocorrelation function is everywhere 0, except in 0, where it is a finite number.

What am I missing here ?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Autocorrelation of white noise.

Loading...

Similar Threads - Autocorrelation white noise | Date |
---|---|

White noise going through a Hilbert filter. | Jun 22, 2013 |

Autocorrelation function from PDF? | Mar 24, 2013 |

Stationary vs. Autocorrelation. | Feb 12, 2013 |

Autocorrelation of a wiener process | Dec 29, 2012 |

Autocorrelation vs Hurst exponent. differences and similarities | Feb 26, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**