Variance of White Noise: How Can It Have Infinite Power?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the apparent contradiction between the finite variance of white noise and its infinite power, particularly in the context of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). Participants explore theoretical aspects of white noise, its power spectral density, and the implications of these characteristics in statistical processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how white noise can have infinite power while its variance is finite, referencing the relationship between power spectral density and variance.
  • Another participant explains that white noise has a constant power spectral density, leading to infinite power when integrated over all frequencies, but notes practical limitations in real systems.
  • A participant clarifies that while white noise is defined by a flat power spectral density, the variance is a statistical parameter that can be finite, leading to confusion about the nature of power in white noise.
  • There is a suggestion that different definitions of "power" may be at play in the discussion, particularly when considering statistical processes versus deterministic signals.
  • One participant challenges a claim regarding the relationship between the variance of a Gaussian variable and the delta function, asserting that Gaussian noise is not white over an infinite frequency span.
  • Another participant emphasizes that white noise is a mathematical construct and cannot exist in a physical sense, as it would require an infinitely long waveform.
  • Further elaboration is requested on why a signal must be infinitely long to exhibit true white noise characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of white noise and its characteristics. There is no consensus reached regarding the relationship between finite variance and infinite power, as well as the physical realizability of white noise.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the definitions and assumptions surrounding white noise, particularly regarding the mathematical constructs versus physical realizations. The discussion also touches on the implications of finite duration signals on autocorrelation functions.

physics baws
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a pretty simple question which I thought I do not need to make a topic about, but Google is actually not helping, which is surprising. So here it goes:

How can white noise have infinite power if its variance is finite?

As far as I am aware, the following is always valid for a stationary zero-mean random process X which is classified as white noise (i.e. flat power spectrum)

R_{x}(t)|_{t=0}= power = E[X^2(t)] = \sigma^2 \cdot \delta(t)|_{t=0} = infinite = Var[X(t)] = \sigma^2 = finite

assuming that the statisics of the random process are anything with the finite variance, for example, Gaussian distribution. So, yeah, I'm looking at the AWGN.

So, what gives?

And I am aware of the physique of the realistic white processes, however I'm purely interested in the theoretical point of view here, so let's assume that this white process does have an infinite power. How is that possible when we also assumed that its variance is finite?

Many thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what you wrote, so I will address only your question about the power of AWGN being infinite. The definition of white noise is that it has a constant power spectral density (PSD). Integrating over all frequencies gives infinite power. The catch is that the noise is never white over frequencies from 0 to infinity. At very high frequencies, for instance, quantum effects take over, and in practice circuits and systems roll off long before that point. When we say that the power is sigma^2, that is the PSD integrated over the bandwidth of our system, measurement device, etc. which is always finite.
 
Hey, thanks for the answer. Let me try to make it clearer

R_{x}(\tau) = E[X(t)X(t+\tau)]
R_{x}(0) = E[X^{2}(t)] = \sigma^2
or
R_{x}(\tau) = \int S(f) e^{j2\pi ft}df
R_{x}(0) = \int S(f) df

The white noise is defined by having a flat power spectral density over the whole range of frequencies. So, that means, from the last formula, that it has an infinite power.
To the best of my knowledge, unrelated to this, we can get a power of the process as given in the second formula, which is variance. Variance is a statistical parameter, independent of the stochastic parameters of the process. In other words, we can have various white processes (Poisson, Gaussian, etc.) as long as the power spectrum is flat.

So, if the variance is finite, it means that the power is finite. On the other hand, by the very definition, the power of the white noise is infinite. Thus, the confusion arises :D
I hope I made it clearer now? From my POV, that is.

Also, I understand that this is an unrealistic scenario, but like I said in the end of the first post, I am mainly interested to see where my reasoning went wrong. AWGN may not exist, but I use it all the time in theory, so I'd like to understand it better.
 
If you are treating white noise as a statistical process, then each particular realization of the process over a given time interval may have a different power. On the other hand if you had an large collection of oscillators with a continuum of frequencies and a constant amplitude and you turned them all on, you would get a (theoretically) deterministic signal. Perhaps there are two different definitions of "power" involved in your question.
 
I think the issue is where you write
R_{x}(t)|_{t=0}= power = E[X^2(t)] = \sigma^2 \cdot \delta(t)|_{t=0} = infinite = Var[X(t)] = \sigma^2 = finite. While it is true that
R_{x}(t)|_{t=0}=E[X^2(t)], it is not true that E[X^2(t)]= \sigma^2 \delta(t)|_{t=0} . Instead, the variance of a Gaussian distributed variable is finite E[X^2] = \sigma^2 without the delta function, as you wrote in your second post. This means that Gaussian noise is not white over an infinite frequency span.

White noise, on the other hand, is a mathematical construct characterized by R(0)=c\delta(0). It is unphysical, since only an infinitely long waveform can possesses a true delta function autocorrelation. Realizable noise can therefore never be white in the mathematical sense. Thus, "white" and "Gaussian" are two different things. Putting them together as AWGN is a useful, and universally used, approximation that is valid for finite bandwidths and finite duration signals.

As a final note, it apparently can be demonstrated with mathematical rigor that a white frequency distribution cannot be represented by a valid probabilistic distribution.

EDIT: The RHS of the last equation should read c\delta(\tau).
 
Last edited:
Ah, I see. That makes sense.

Could you perhaps elaborate just a little bit more on
unphysical, since only an infinitely long waveform
as to why it has to be infinitely long? I'm not sure I see it.

But other than that, I am all good! Thanks!
 
Certainly, I'm happy to expand. A signal x(t) of finite duration T has a finite autocorrelation function at zero lag R(0)=\frac{1}{T}\int_{-T/2}^{T/2}|x(t)|^2dt(and it's finite elsewhere, too, of course). To see this, recognize that the integral is the signal energy, which is finite for a finite-duration signal.

R(0) already differs from the delta function form of the autocorrelation of a signal with a white spectrum, which (since it is a delta function) must be infinite at the origin. Does this make sense?
 
Sorry, I was away these few days. Yeah, that makes sense completely, thanks again :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
33K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K