Average Age on PF: What's the Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Char. Limit
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a poll aimed at determining the average age of users on Physics Forums (PF). Participants share their ages and engage in light-hearted banter about aging, with some humorously claiming to be "older than dirt." The conversation touches on the demographics of the forum, noting a bimodal age distribution, with younger users seeking help and older users participating due to their experience. The lack of participation from those aged 35-44 is attributed to career and family commitments, suggesting that this age group may have less time for online engagement. Participants express curiosity about statistical analysis of the poll results, discussing mean and median ages, and consider the implications of their findings. The thread also features playful interactions and jokes, reflecting a friendly community atmosphere.

How old are you?


  • Total voters
    110
  • #101
FtlIsAwesome said:
Its always about money, huh...

I suppose you could try sexual favors for the mentors, but I'd guess that wouldn't go over well. :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Nevermind...
 
  • #103
Char. Limit said:
I took the gaussian of the first four categories, then the gaussian of the last five categories, divided both by 2 and then added them together! Sure, it's hardly rigorous, but I haven't taken even the most basic of statistics courses.

Results would probably be better if we had a finer discretization of the age ranges.
 
  • #104
jhae2.718 said:
Results would probably be better if we had a finer discretization of the age ranges.

I suppose I could create a separate poll for each category, where you list your exact age. If the mentors don't ban me for flooding the GD forum.
 
  • #105
It's probably not necessary, though; it's not like we're trying to get our results into a journal or anything...
 
  • #106
jhae2.718 said:
It's probably not necessary, though; it's not like we're trying to get our results into a journal or anything...

Says you. I like my distributions to be as accurate as possible, thank you very much.

I just want to ask any mentor who sees this, would you ban me for creating 8 different polls, one for each age group, at once?
 
  • #107
PF needs a journal...

You know, what does it say about us that we're spending Saturday evening doing analysis over a poll on an internet forum? :biggrin:
 
  • #108
Char. Limit said:
I like my distributions to be as accurate as possible, thank you very much.
Seconded. I like to be accurate with a lot of things.
 
  • #109
Allright, here are the results:

Arithmetic mean: 34.03
Geometric mean: 29.31
Harmonic mean: 25.45
Modus: 21
Median: 30

Variance: 278.91
Standard Deviation: 16.7

Kurtosis: -0.55
Skewness: 0.54

Enjoy!
 
  • #110
How are you assuming ages are distributed within the discrete groupings?
 
  • #112
jhae2.718 said:
How are you assuming ages are distributed within the discrete groupings?

I think it's standard to take the midpoints of ranges. I should reread in my stat book on how to deal with this situation...

I really want a PF journal! Imagine the breakthroughs we could publish :-p
 
  • #113
micromass said:
I really want a PF journal! Imagine the breakthroughs we could publish :-p

Why 1 != 0.999...
Division by zero: a new indeterminate form and valid arithmetic operation in R
 
  • #114
Poll 2, for 35-54:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484647
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #115
jhae2.718 said:
Why 1 != 0.999...
Division by zero: a new indeterminate form and valid arithmetic operation in R

Don't forget "Irrational numbers don't exist" and the various (dis)proofs for FLT and Riemann Hypothesis...
And maybe a humor section with most funny insults like "smug and condescending cheapo"...
 
  • #116
Aaaaand Poll 3, for 55 and up!

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=484649

Now to wait a bit for results to come in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #117
I actually want multivariate polls where you can see the correlation between age, gender, scientific interest, music taste, political preference and general happiness...

But I doubt PF will let me do that :cry:
 
  • #118
Char. Limit said:
I made a crude graph of the bimodal distribution we have here. I checked, and the integral over R of this function IS 1, so it's a proper pdf. And I think it's pretty interesting.

wolframalpha-20110326190842211.gif

Nice job Char,

I have a reasonable explanation for the drop in membership or the lack of reporting for the mid 30 somethings to the mid 40 somethings, I know because I have been there and have the T-Shirt to prove it. People in this range are:

A: busy with building their careers and/or
B: raising a family which requires attention not conducive to being a good PF contributor
C: more free time = more PF time at a young age and once children are raised and out of the house

Rhody... :wink:
 
  • #119
micromass said:
And maybe a humor section with most funny insults like "smug and condescending cheapo"...
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=475840
It got locked right away. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #120
So, who should be on the editorial board of the PF journal?
 
  • #121
jhae2.718 said:
So, who should be on the editorial board of the PF journal?

I should.
 
  • #122
Char. Limit said:
I should.

I'm glad that you would put your name under articles like 1!=0.999... and "irrational numbers don't exist" :biggrin:
 
  • #123
micromass said:
I'm glad that you would put your name under articles like 1!=0.999... and "irrational numbers don't exist" :biggrin:

Well, they obviously don't. If they existed, then we could rationally calculate them and estimate them. But we can't, because they're irrational. Therefore, all numbers are rational.
 
  • #124
It would be funny if there was a Journal of Crackpottery.
 
  • #125
jhae2.718 said:
It would be funny if there was a Journal of Crackpottery.

There's always

http://www.crank.net/
 
  • #126
Math Is Hard said:
There's always

http://www.crank.net/

I'd forgotten about that, thanks!

Edit: crank.net has PF listed as "A resource where you can discuss cranks or crankism.":
 
Last edited:
  • #127
jhae2.718 said:
I'd forgotten about that, thanks!

Edit: crank.net has PF listed as "A resource where you can discuss cranks or crankism.":

Nobody accused them of being especially bright.
 
  • #128
FtlIsAwesome said:
What if the cat is curious but isn't satisfied?

What if the cat merely 'thinks' it's a cat, but is in fact, a cat it is not...?
 
  • #129
Steppn said:
What if the cat merely 'thinks' it's a cat, but is in fact, a cat it is not...?
Too much introspection for a cat. It will easily pass its "curiosity kills" threshold at that level. Cats are dull and unintelligent because all the smart ones have been weeded out.
 
  • #130
turbo-1 said:
Too much introspection for a cat. It will easily pass its "curiosity kills" threshold at that level. Cats are dull and unintelligent because all the smart ones have been weeded out.

Ahhh, 'catural selection'.
 
  • #131
Steppn said:
What if the cat merely 'thinks' it's a cat, but is in fact, a cat it is not...?

The universe implodes in a clap of contradiction and pique.
 
  • #132
nismaratwork said:
The universe implodes in a clap of contradiction and pique.

I wonder if that makes Verschränkung obsolete?
 
  • #133
Steppn said:
I wonder if that makes Verschränkung obsolete?

Yeah, we'd go from Geselshaft to uber Gemeinschaft (squish) pretty quickly given a universal implosion. :-p
 
Back
Top